First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 140707
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: GCC Porting Team <gcc-porting@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 140707 depends on: 112138 117482 117489 118073 123756 123939 130819 131312 131937 133538 133806 134279 136136 136288 137372 138099 138438 139249 139385 140705 140711 140715 140718 140720 140721 140724 140903 140904 140905 141181 141248 141249 141352 141354 141355 141388 141390 141396 141400 141403 141404 141406 141411 141413 141414 141418 141421 141425 141432 141438 141440 141441 141446 141449 141450 141451 141452 141454 141455 141567 141755 141905 141919 141920 142194 142267 142288 142395 142935 142948 142949 143836 144036 144141 144167 144222 144224 144273 144275 144279 144367 144368 144369 144373 144375 144676 145046 145126 145244 145272 145371 145483 145549 145669 145783 145801 145811 145823 145841 145885 145891 145944 145971 145987 145989 145996 146009 146058 146067 146080 146102 146103 146142 146186 146194 146225 146254 146285 146335 146394 146396 146409 146422 146423 146445 146451 146453 146478 146522 146538 146590 146743 146781 146894 146897 146939 146950 146954 147538 147539 147776 147783 147790 147795 147844 148035 148261 148358 148573 148837 148898 148925 148951 149256 149522 149751 149851 149964 150382 150608 150627 150859 151031 151274 151376 151424 151429 151809 151936 152041 152062 152210 152247 152364 152465 152486 152491 152500 152822 153036 153059 153218 153356 153645 153667 153668 154049 154998 155258 155555 155828 157477 157858 159152 166143 168148 173473 173683 173696 176268 204382 Show dependency tree
Bug 140707 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-07-16 15:26 0000
This bug will be used to track packages whose stable versions don't work with
GCC 4.1.x.  In most cases a patch, version bump, or other fix is available in
~arch, and a request will be filed to either backport the fix or stablize a
working version.

These arches have GCC 4.1.1 in testing:
amd64, mips, ppc64, s390, x86, x86-fsbd

If you know that any of these arches aren't planning on getting 4.1 stable any
time soon make a note.  

hppa and ppc already have 4.1.1 stable :p.

------- Comment #1 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-07-18 06:16:00 0000 -------
All of the packages from 138099 need to go stable for GCC 4.1.1

------- Comment #2 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-07-18 07:22:01 0000 -------
Also, dev-libs/gmp-4.2.1 and dev-libs/mpfr-2.2.0_p10 will need to go stable...

------- Comment #3 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-07-18 07:22:49 0000 -------
Well, amd64 and x86 are planning on taking 4.1.1 stable by the 2006.1 release,
which isn't that far away.

------- Comment #4 From Christian Faulhammer 2006-07-19 00:41:13 0000 -------
bug #140905 is not finally fixed, there are still issues with dietlibc and GCC
4.1 on some arches...resolution later.

------- Comment #5 From Ryan Hill 2006-07-30 21:27:48 0000 -------
kind of off topic, but i would _really_ like to see the gcc-4.1.1.ebuild DEPEND
on binutils-2.17 which adds support for .weakref[i] and properly handles
-msecure-pit on PPC32.

if we really wanted to get crazy, i would say minimum 2.17.50.0.3 for the new
--hash-style support[ii] and the MIPS MFTGPR and MTTGPR fixes, but i'm not
holding my breath on this one. ;d


[i] http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00107.html
[ii] http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-06/msg00418.html

------- Comment #6 From SpanKY 2006-07-30 21:35:41 0000 -------
that's up to the ppc team if they want to force binutils-2.17

as for the snapshots, not a chance

------- Comment #7 From Ryan Hill 2006-08-11 19:39:43 0000 -------
does the gcc migration doc need to be updated at all?

------- Comment #8 From Christian Faulhammer 2006-08-13 23:05:19 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> does the gcc migration doc need to be updated at all?

 Don't think so...worked fine here when using the "generic guide".

------- Comment #9 From Ryan Hill 2006-08-18 18:59:17 0000 -------
i just finished working through everything on bug #117482 (except games-*). 
anything not working on stable should now have a bug here.  between the two i
think this should pretty much cover it (for x86 at least). :)

------- Comment #10 From Chris L. Mason 2006-08-30 04:07:11 0000 -------
Can someone with permission please add a dependency on bug #132667 (qemu not
compiling with gcc-4.1.*.

Thanks.

------- Comment #11 From Christian Faulhammer 2006-08-30 04:44:38 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Can someone with permission please add a dependency on bug #132667 (qemu not
> compiling with gcc-4.1.*.

 It already blocks the gcc porting bug.  This bug here is for stabilisation
requests.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug