First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 140490
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: PAM Gentoo Team <pam-bugs@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Jakub Moc <jakub@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 140490 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 140490 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-07-15 07:14 0000
sys-auth/nss_ldap-174-r2: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 239-r1 &&
not ( ver = 226 && ver-rev => 226-r1 ) ), affects ('sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/nss_ldap-202: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 239-r1 && not
( ver = 226 && ver-rev => 226-r1 ) ), affects ('sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/nss_ldap-207: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 239-r1 && not
( ver = 226 && ver-rev => 226-r1 ) ), affects ('sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/nss_ldap-207-r1: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 239-r1 &&
not ( ver = 226 && ver-rev => 226-r1 ) ), affects ('sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/nss_ldap-210: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 239-r1 && not
( ver = 226 && ver-rev => 226-r1 ) ), affects ('sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/nss_ldap-211: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 239-r1 && not
( ver = 226 && ver-rev => 226-r1 ) ), affects ('sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/nss_ldap-215: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 239-r1 && not
( ver = 226 && ver-rev => 226-r1 ) ), affects ('amd64', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/nss_ldap-215-r1: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 239-r1 &&
not ( ver = 226 && ver-rev => 226-r1 ) ), affects ('amd64', 'hppa', 'ppc',
'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/nss_ldap-220: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 239-r1 && not
( ver = 226 && ver-rev => 226-r1 ) ), affects ('alpha', 'amd64', 'hppa', 'ppc',
'ppc64', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/nss_ldap-226: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 239-r1 && not
( ver = 226 && ver-rev => 226-r1 ) ), affects ('alpha', 'amd64', 'hppa', 'ppc',
'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/nss_ldap-234: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 239-r1 && not
( ver = 226 && ver-rev => 226-r1 ) ), affects ('alpha', 'amd64', 'hppa', 'ppc',
'ppc64', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/nss_ldap-238: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 239-r1 && not
( ver = 226 && ver-rev => 226-r1 ) ), affects ('alpha', 'amd64', 'hppa', 'ppc',
'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/nss_ldap-239: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 239-r1 && not
( ver = 226 && ver-rev => 226-r1 ) ), affects ('alpha', 'amd64', 'hppa', 'ppc',
'sparc', 'x86')

sys-auth/pam_ldap-156: vulnerable via glsa(200508-22) ( ver < 180 ), affects
('amd64', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-156: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 178-r1 ),
affects ('amd64', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-161: vulnerable via glsa(200508-22) ( ver < 180 ), affects
('sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-161: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 178-r1 ),
affects ('sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-164: vulnerable via glsa(200508-22) ( ver < 180 ), affects
('sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-164: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 178-r1 ),
affects ('sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-167: vulnerable via glsa(200508-22) ( ver < 180 ), affects
('hppa', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-167: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 178-r1 ),
affects ('hppa', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-171: vulnerable via glsa(200508-22) ( ver < 180 ), affects
('alpha', 'hppa', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-171: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 178-r1 ),
affects ('alpha', 'hppa', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-176: vulnerable via glsa(200508-22) ( ver < 180 ), affects
('alpha', 'hppa', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-176: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 178-r1 ),
affects ('alpha', 'hppa', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-176-r1: vulnerable via glsa(200508-22) ( ver < 180 ), affects
('alpha', 'hppa', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-176-r1: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 178-r1 ),
affects ('alpha', 'hppa', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-178: vulnerable via glsa(200508-22) ( ver < 180 ), affects
('alpha', 'hppa', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-178: vulnerable via glsa(200507-13) ( ver-rev < 178-r1 ),
affects ('alpha', 'hppa', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_ldap-178-r1: vulnerable via glsa(200508-22) ( ver < 180 ), affects
('alpha', 'amd64', 'hppa', 'ppc', 'ppc64', 'sparc', 'x86')

sys-auth/pam_mysql-0.5: vulnerable via glsa(200606-18) ( ver < 0.7_rc1 ),
affects ('alpha', 'amd64', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
sys-auth/pam_mysql-0.6.0: vulnerable via glsa(200606-18) ( ver < 0.7_rc1 ),
affects ('alpha', 'amd64', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')

Please, clean up the above. Thanks.

------- Comment #1 From Luca Longinotti 2006-07-15 08:34:36 0000 -------
All vulnerable pam-mysql releases deleted.
Best regards, CHTEKK.

------- Comment #2 From Jakub Moc 2006-09-02 16:55:59 0000 -------
Please, do it...

------- Comment #3 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2006-09-19 12:58:13 0000 -------
<hansmi> robbat2: Should I clean up nss_ldap and bump to 253? (Just tested the
latter one)
<robbat2> there are folk still reporting problems with the new ones, and they
are finding a need to use the old ones still
<robbat2> i'm certain it's upstream buggery, but I haven't managed to trace it
down yet

Hence it isn't cleaned yet.

------- Comment #4 From Matthias Geerdsen 2006-10-11 06:19:59 0000 -------
The older versions should really be removed if possible, since there is also
another issue affecting those (s. bug #150294).

------- Comment #5 From Diego Pettenò 2006-10-12 09:27:16 0000 -------
I've removed old pam_ldap versions at least.. nss_ldap is, as Robin said, still
there.

------- Comment #6 From Jakub Moc 2006-12-01 11:38:49 0000 -------
All done, wheeeeee! :)

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug