First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 140484
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Quality Assistance Team <qa@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Jakub Moc (RETIRED) <jakub@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 140484 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 140484 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-07-15 06:56 0000 
app-editors/xemacs-21.4.9: vulnerable via glsa(200502-20) ( ver-rev <
21.4.15-r3 ), affects ('ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
app-editors/xemacs-21.4.12: vulnerable via glsa(200502-20) ( ver-rev <
21.4.15-r3 ), affects ('alpha', 'amd64', 'ppc', 'sparc', 'x86')
app-editors/xemacs-21.4.15: vulnerable via glsa(200502-20) ( ver-rev <
21.4.15-r3 ), affects ('ppc',)
app-editors/xemacs-21.4.15-r1: vulnerable via glsa(200502-20) ( ver-rev <
21.4.15-r3 ), affects ('alpha', 'amd64', 'ppc', 'ppc64', 'sparc', 'x86')
app-editors/xemacs-21.4.15-r2: vulnerable via glsa(200502-20) ( ver-rev <
21.4.15-r3 ), affects ('alpha', 'amd64', 'ppc', 'ppc64', 'sparc', 'x86')

Assigning to treecleaners, xemacs stuff has been w/o any maintainer for ages.

------- Comment #1 From Alec Warner 2006-07-15 10:25:45 0000 ------- 
Treecleaners doesn't really do this at present, although we may expand it in
the future.  Co-ordinate between qa and security.

------- Comment #2 From Chris White (RETIRED) 2006-08-05 18:42:34 0000 ------- 
mkennedy,

You seem to have touched this per changelog.  I've got the effected versions
queued up for cvs removal, say the word and I'll punt um for good.

------- Comment #3 From Matthew Kennedy (RETIRED) 2006-08-05 21:14:17 0000 ------- 
ok please go ahead.

------- Comment #4 From Chris White (RETIRED) 2006-08-05 21:25:13 0000 ------- 
Alright, insecure versions removed.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug