First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 139505
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: DUPLICATE of bug 117218
Assigned To: Chris White (RETIRED) <chriswhite@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 139505 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 139505 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-07-06 19:19 0000 
In my x86 catalyst builds, I ran across the issue of swig-1.3.21 failing to
build with gcc4. I stabled 1.3.25 in my snapshot, and it built just fine. This
version is already stable on a few arches.

------- Comment #1 From Chris White (RETIRED) 2006-07-06 19:43:11 0000 ------- 
The original bug report was for a gcc4 failure.  Looking at the ChangeLog it
seems ppc was effected by this too, so I'd rather chuck this across the board. 
So here's the keywords lowdown:

alpha ~amd64 ~arm hppa ia64 ~mips ppc ~ppc-macos ppc64 ~s390 ~sparc ~x86

So I need amd64, mips, ppc-macos, s390 (which is like Spanky and that's it I
think), sparc, and x86 to mark swig-1.3.21 stable on their perspective arches. 
As a future roadmap I'll be looking at 1.3.29 after a month.

------- Comment #2 From Christian Faulhammer 2006-07-06 23:12:14 0000 ------- 
Is this bug connected in any way to bug #117218 ? To me it seems so.

------- Comment #3 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-07-07 07:02:07 0000 ------- 
So shouldn't this be marked as a DUPE and have the arches added to the other
bug?

Anyway, x86/amd64 done... so no need to add them if you do DUPE it.

------- Comment #4 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2006-07-10 14:48:35 0000 ------- 
sparc stable.

------- Comment #5 From Fabian Groffen 2006-07-15 07:00:09 0000 ------- 
We're not stable in any swig as far as I can see.  Because of the USE-flags
which require stuff which is not there, I'd rather not stable this on
ppc-macos.

------- Comment #6 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-07-18 06:09:31 0000 ------- 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 117218 ***
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug