First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 137433
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Kerberos Maintainers <kerberos@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Paul B. Henson <henson@acm.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 137433 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 137433 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-06-20 15:06 0000
I'm working on configuring a new Kerberos V infrastructure with Gentoo. I'm
wondering why the mit-krb5 ebuild specifies localstatedir to be /etc instead of
the default /var/lib? The Kerberos databases are stored in the localstatedir,
and it seems odd for them to be in /etc rather than /var or /var/lib. In
particular, on my system / is a fixed partition with a fixed size, intended for
only small files and minimal expansion. Configuration files meet that criteria,
but not application databases. /var, on the other hand, is under LVM and
dynamically resizable online.

It would seem more consistent and efficient to put KDC databases under /var,
similar to where openldap databases are kept. I plan to update a local copy of
the ebuild to move them to /var/lib, it would be nice if that became the
default.

------- Comment #1 From Emanuele Giaquinta (RETIRED) 2006-06-22 02:53:37 0000 -------
Agreed, if seemant has no objections we'll do in the next revbump.

------- Comment #2 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2006-06-22 04:51:51 0000 -------
no argument from me on this, I think it's a good thing to do.

------- Comment #3 From Emanuele Giaquinta (RETIRED) 2006-07-06 09:20:49 0000 -------
fixed in mit-krb5-1.4.3-r2, thanks.

------- Comment #4 From Emanuele Giaquinta (RETIRED) 2006-07-06 09:21:18 0000 -------
...

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug