Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 136553 - binutils-2.16.94 released
Summary: binutils-2.16.94 released
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers
URL: ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/binutils...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-06-12 09:27 UTC by Cory Grunden
Modified: 2006-06-17 00:13 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Cory Grunden 2006-06-12 09:27:24 UTC
Looks like binutils-2.17.05.02 was released a bit too early, because binutils-2.16.94 was released this morning.  Wouldn't the version differences cause a problem?  Also, it looks like the --as-needed fixes were merged into 2.16.94.
Comment 1 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2006-06-14 21:23:13 UTC
no, 2.17.xxx is taken from a different cvs branch than 2.16.9x
Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2006-06-14 22:07:17 UTC
in portage
Comment 3 Cory Grunden 2006-06-15 11:20:20 UTC
No, binutils-2.16.9x are the prereleases of binutils-2.17.  binutils-2.17.05.02 came from ftp.kernel.org long before binutils-2.16.94 was released.  So logically binutils-2.17.05.02 version doesn't make any sense.
Comment 4 Cory Grunden 2006-06-15 11:23:56 UTC
binutils-2.17.05.02 = binutils 2006 0526 in CVS on sources.redhat.com
binutils-2.16.94    = binutils 2006 0612 in CVS on sources.redhat.com
Comment 5 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2006-06-15 11:27:17 UTC
wrong

binutils-2.17.xx and 2.16.9x are taken from different cvs trees
Comment 6 Harald van Dijk (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-15 11:33:21 UTC
It's nice to have an ebuild for 2.16.94, but with the current eclass's SRC_URI emerge can't find the sources. 2.16.94 isn't available on any GNU mirror (I had to download it manually from sourceware.org), and the patchsets don't seem to be available on any Gentoo mirrors, even distfiles.gentoo.org (and these I don't even know where to get elsewhere)
Comment 7 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2006-06-15 12:36:11 UTC
looks like i uploaded the patchsets but forgot to move them out of my ~

should be available now

as for the binutils snapshot, ive mirrored that on gentoo infra already
Comment 8 Harald van Dijk (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-15 22:40:12 UTC
Okay, now binutils-2.16.94-patches-1.0.tar.bz2 can be downloaded, but...

>>> Downloading ftp://gentoo.mirrored.ca/distfiles/binutils-2.16.94-patches-1.0.tar.bz2
--07:40:20--  ftp://gentoo.mirrored.ca/distfiles/binutils-2.16.94-patches-1.0.tar.bz2
           => `/var/dist/binutils-2.16.94-patches-1.0.tar.bz2'
Resolving gentoo.mirrored.ca... 142.77.49.225
Connecting to gentoo.mirrored.ca|142.77.49.225|:21... connected.
Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
==> SYST ... done.    ==> PWD ... done.
==> TYPE I ... done.  ==> CWD /distfiles ... done.
==> PASV ... done.    ==> RETR binutils-2.16.94-patches-1.0.tar.bz2 ... done.
Length: 8,685 (8.5K) (unauthoritative)

100%[===================================================================>] 8,685         --.--K/s             

07:40:21 (66.33 KB/s) - `/var/dist/binutils-2.16.94-patches-1.0.tar.bz2' saved [8685]

('Filesize does not match recorded size', 8685L, 7906)
!!! Fetched file: binutils-2.16.94-patches-1.0.tar.bz2 VERIFY FAILED!
!!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
!!! Got:      Filesize does not match recorded size
!!! Expected: 8685
Removing corrupt distfile...

happens with all mirrors. (The error message is obviously incorrect, I'll file a separate bug on that.)
Comment 9 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2006-06-17 00:13:04 UTC
looks like portage has problems updating digests properly ... fixed in cvs now