First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 136023
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Science Related Packages <sci@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Sourav Mandal <sourav@sourav.net>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 136023 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 136023 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-06-07 20:43 0000 
the scipy ebuild needs blas-config to detect implementations.  However, the
ebuilds >=blas-atlas-3.7.0 use provide an eselect interface.

If the scipy ebuild wants to use >=blas-atlas-3.7.0, it should use eselect
(whose blas module doesn't work right now), or depend on blas-config.

------- Comment #1 From Sébastien Fabbro 2006-06-08 00:13:41 0000 ------- 
Which scipy version?
Could you try scipy-0.4.9 from the scientific overlay and report here? It fixes
the blas-config dependency. I doubt scipy needs >=blas-atlas-3.7 since it is a
development version.

------- Comment #2 From Donnie Berkholz 2006-06-16 18:04:27 0000 ------- 
We're reworking the eselect modules right now -- I'm just about to commit the
new ones. So the next eselect release will have many changes that will help to
deal with this.

------- Comment #3 From Donnie Berkholz 2006-08-06 21:08:18 0000 ------- 
Yeah, we should definitely fix blas-atlas to install a blas-config file before
stabilizing on 3.7.

------- Comment #4 From Donnie Berkholz 2006-08-20 15:54:57 0000 ------- 
OK 3.7.11 now uses blas-config again. However something needs to get figured
out soon because we're shortly going to unmask a new eselect interface.
Preferably scipy should stop doing this checking altogether -- I know there was
some reason for it, but it's not worth it.

------- Comment #5 From Donnie Berkholz 2006-09-24 00:38:31 0000 ------- 
scipy 0.5.1 no longer has this check.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug