First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 13531
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: George Shapovalov <george@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Todd Geders <geders@purdue.edu>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
pymol-0.86.ebuild Ebuild for pymol-0.86 text/plain Todd Geders 2003-02-04 16:03 0000 1.23 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 13531 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 13531 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-01-08 20:21 0000 
Version 0.86 is now available...ebuild anyone?  I would, but it appears I am
stupid, and cannot figure it out

------- Comment #1 From Todd Geders 2003-02-04 16:02:56 0000 ------- 
Well, ebuild is identical, just rename for new version.  Testing here indicates
no problems.

------- Comment #2 From Todd Geders 2003-02-04 16:03:56 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=7933) [edit]
Ebuild for pymol-0.86

Here's the ebuild, tested fine on x86

------- Comment #3 From George Shapovalov 2003-02-05 11:52:00 0000 ------- 
Hi Todd.

Thanks for a submission!
I have updated the ebuild. Please test.
BTW,Just mentioning that you have tested renmed ebuild is sufficient in such situation, no need to attach identical file ;). 

Technical note: to me it looks like few dependencies listed in DEPEND are really a run-time dependencies - namely dev-python/pmw and dev-python/Numeric and should thus go into RDEPEND instead. Any comments on this?

George

------- Comment #4 From Todd Geders 2003-02-05 12:32:53 0000 ------- 
I agree, they are run-time dependancies.  I'm unable to find the ebuild though,
but I will test once I find it (will it be on portage or somewhere else?).

------- Comment #5 From Todd Geders 2003-02-05 20:47:19 0000 ------- 
Updated ebuild was just tested, everything seems golden

------- Comment #6 From George Shapovalov 2003-03-11 15:43:45 0000 ------- 
Hi Todd.

Thanks for testing! And sorry for delay with unmasking. 
We were in a freeze for quite a while, though now with rc3 out we are moving lots of stuff into stable.
The ebuild is unmasked. 

George

------- Comment #7 From John Davis 2003-04-04 01:21:40 0000 ------- 
db fix

------- Comment #8 From John Davis 2003-04-04 01:26:31 0000 ------- 
db fix
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug