First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 13463
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: media-gfx herd <graphics@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Arnaud Launay <asl@launay.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
exif-0.6.tar Tar file containing media-gfx/exif application/octet-stream Arnaud Launay 2003-01-07 19:36 0000 10.00 KB Details
exif-0.6.9.ebuild updated ebuild for exif requires new libexif text/plain Andreas Kobara 2004-09-13 06:41 0000 725 bytes Details
libexif-0.6.10.ebuild updated libexif, don't forget to revdep-rebuild text/plain Andreas Kobara 2004-09-13 06:44 0000 1002 bytes Details
nautilus-2.6.3-libexif-0.6.patch Nautilus 2.6.3 libexif-0.6 patch patch Andreas Kobara 2004-09-24 06:40 0000 749 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 13463 depends on: 13435 13462 Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 13463 blocks: 65602
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2003-01-07 19:35 0000
Small CLI util to show EXIF infos hidden in JPEG files

------- Comment #1 From Arnaud Launay 2003-01-07 19:36:11 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=7076) [edit]
Tar file containing media-gfx/exif

------- Comment #2 From Arnaud Launay 2003-01-07 19:37:35 0000 -------
I'm not very sure about the placement under media-gfx, please check.

------- Comment #3 From Andreas Kobara 2004-09-13 06:41:10 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=39503) [edit]
updated ebuild for exif requires new libexif

exif meanwhile is version 0.6.9, and as it is similar to media-gfx/exiftags it
should belong to media-gfx too.

for version 0.6.9 to compile media-libs/libexif version >=0.6.9 is required.
see next attachment.

Therefore media-libs/libmnote can be deleted as it is not any longer required
nor existant. Don't forget to revdep-rebuild your applications.

------- Comment #4 From Andreas Kobara 2004-09-13 06:44:13 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=39504) [edit]
updated libexif, don't forget to revdep-rebuild

(forgot to obsolete 0.6.0 ebuild, could someone please...)

------- Comment #5 From Arnaud Launay 2004-09-13 06:55:33 0000 -------
(From update of attachment 7076 [edit])
Patch obsoleted, as abusch@gmx.net posted a new recent one.

------- Comment #6 From Arnaud Launay 2004-09-13 06:55:36 0000 -------
(From update of attachment 7076 [edit])
Patch obsoleted, as abusch@gmx.net posted a new recent one.

------- Comment #7 From Andreas Kobara 2004-09-24 06:40:38 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=40296) [edit]
Nautilus 2.6.3 libexif-0.6 patch

When upgrading to libexif-0.6, it is required to patch nautilus-2.6.3.

------- Comment #8 From foser (RETIRED) 2004-09-28 08:12:16 0000 -------
so how does this patch work with the 0.5 version, does it still build when
applied ? We need a failsafe solution here.

------- Comment #9 From Scott Taylor (RETIRED) 2004-09-28 14:26:32 0000 -------
easy solution for that: dont apply unless new libexif installed

has_version '>=media-libs/libexif-0.6' && epatch ${FILESDIR}/${P}-libexif-0.6.patch

the eog-2.8 sources have those lines in a #ifdef OLD_LIBEXIF or
something to that effect. and since that is all compile-time too,
its essentially the same solution.

------- Comment #10 From foser (RETIRED) 2004-09-29 02:38:34 0000 -------
yeah i suppose. I prefer the second solution, because its not a gentoo level
hack. Was waiting for someone to do the works.

------- Comment #11 From Luud Heck 2005-03-15 11:33:02 0000 -------
* BUMP *

Is somebody still looking into this?
I really do need this as jhead (even the latest 2.2 as in portage now) is too limited for my needs.

I installed libexif-0.6.10-r1 (which is ~x86) and build exif-0.6.9 manually agains it, so my immediate needs are met. It would be great however this tool would make it into portage (~x86 is fine for me).

I'll try the ebuild in my portage overlay to see if it works for me that way as well.

------- Comment #12 From Luud Heck 2005-03-15 11:46:18 0000 -------
Tried the ebuild as attached in this bug report via my portage overlay.

Changed the keywords in the ebuild to ~x86 and friends, added it to /etc/portage/package.keywords so I stay in sync with libexif.

revdep-rebuild gave no problems for me, running gnome 2.8 (thus nautilus gnome 2.8)

------- Comment #13 From dams 2005-04-01 06:31:38 0000 -------
added in cvs, thank you

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug