First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 134514
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: The Gentoo Linux Hardened Team <hardened@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) <kevquinn@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
binutils-2.16.1-znonow.patch Add '-z nonow' support to ld patch Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) 2006-05-27 05:45 0000 495 bytes Details | Diff
binutils-060613-zlazy.patch Patch accepted upstream against HEAD patch Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) 2006-06-13 23:36 0000 2.23 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 134514 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 134514 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-05-27 05:42 0000 
Had trouble getting autotools to accept '-nonow' and pass it to gcc when
linking the .so - it gets passed when generating the .la but not the .so. 
However it does pass '-Wl,<blah>' properly, so I figured it'd be easier to add
'-z nonow' to ld.
Patch to follow.

------- Comment #1 From solar 2006-05-27 05:44:03 0000 ------- 
I had a patch todo this at one point but I lost it. Lets see if yours is better
;)

------- Comment #2 From Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) 2006-05-27 05:45:47 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=87638) [edit]
Add '-z nonow' support to ld

------- Comment #3 From solar 2006-05-27 06:14:57 0000 ------- 
Looks good. md5sum even probably matched what I had before.
This should probably be sent upstream also as it just makes sense.

------- Comment #4 From SpanKY 2006-06-03 22:22:21 0000 ------- 
yes, please get this added upstream before our binutils

------- Comment #5 From Michal Suchanek 2006-06-13 05:36:53 0000 ------- 
please, add the patch to allow building the X server on hadrened.

------- Comment #6 From Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) 2006-06-13 23:33:18 0000 ------- 
Woohoo :)  Upstream accepted the change, with a modification; the option is '-z
lazy' not '-z nonow'.

------- Comment #7 From Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) 2006-06-13 23:36:20 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=89116) [edit]
Patch accepted upstream against HEAD

This is the patch that was accepted.  It may well apply with fuzz to older
versions but I'll check and supply a patch against 2.16.1 if necessary.

------- Comment #8 From SpanKY 2006-06-14 21:57:52 0000 ------- 
added to 2.16.94

i'll just wait until the next cvs snapshot for the 2.17.xx ebuilds

------- Comment #9 From SpanKY 2006-06-29 20:12:10 0000 ------- 
2.16.1-r3 in portage now too with the patch so solar will get off my back

------- Comment #10 From solar 2006-06-29 23:39:25 0000 ------- 
I'm not done with you yet.. You forgot to upload the patchball :p
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug