Bug 132887 – x11-libs/qt-3.3.6-r4 stabilization request

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Caleb Tennis (RETIRED) 2006-05-10 05:37:23 UTC]

I'd like to request stabilization of qt-3.3.6-r1.  3.3.6 has been in portage since Mar 17, and -r1 readds some patches that were present in previous versions but got dropped in the initial revbump to make sure they were still needed.

[Comment 1 Caleb Tennis (RETIRED) 2006-05-10 05:37:36 UTC]

adding all arches

[Comment 2 Ferris McCormick (RETIRED) 2006-05-10 07:45:56 UTC]

I'll note that it builds and seems good for sparc, bug I don't use KDE so I am not going to mark it stable.

[Comment 3 Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2006-05-10 18:43:51 UTC]

Is there some reason this ebuild gets to bypass the "30 days in the tree before being marked stable" policy?

[Comment 4 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) 2006-05-11 02:46:53 UTC]

stable on ppc64

[Comment 5 Caleb Tennis (RETIRED) 2006-05-11 04:04:37 UTC]

It's your call.  3.3.6 has been stable 30 days.  3.3.6-r1 is simply me readding patches that were present in 3.3.4 and 3.3.5 but I initially dropped when doing 3.3.6 because I wasn't sure if they were still needed or not.

[Comment 6 Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2006-05-12 05:19:27 UTC]

SPARC'd

[Comment 7 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-05-12 12:43:56 UTC]

x86 done

[Comment 8 Luca Barbato 2006-05-12 14:30:57 UTC]

ppc done

[Comment 9 Thomas Cort (RETIRED) 2006-05-12 15:33:51 UTC]

stable on alpha.

[Comment 10 Steve Yin 2006-05-25 23:44:46 UTC]

what about stable it on amd64?

[Comment 11 Guy Martin (RETIRED) 2006-05-26 03:31:06 UTC]

Made it stable yesterday on hppa.

[Comment 12 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-05-26 07:28:14 UTC]

amd64 is done

[Comment 13 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2006-05-28 14:49:47 UTC]

(In reply to comment #12)
> amd64 is done

 PDEPEND.bad                    2
   x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6-r1.ebuild: amd64(default-linux/amd64/2006.0) ['~dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.6']
   x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6-r1.ebuild: amd64(default-linux/amd64/2006.0/no-multilib) ['~dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.6']
 

Looks like you haven't used repoman...

[Comment 14 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-05-30 08:52:45 UTC]

Strange... I used repoman... just forgot to commit on the qt-unixODBC ebuild... got it now... sorry about that

[Comment 15 Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) 2006-10-15 14:46:10 UTC]

ia64 done.

[Comment 16 Caleb Tennis (RETIRED) 2006-12-06 05:06:23 UTC]

anyone on the mips team want to take a crack at this?

[Comment 17 Stuart Longland (RETIRED) 2007-02-24 17:00:52 UTC]

Just having a look now, it seems there is no qt-3.3.6-r1.  I have, however, done some testing of qt-3.3.6-r5.  I have KDE 3.5.6 built against it, and running quite successfully on my Loongson machine (mipsel).  I intend to test it on big-endian MIPS too -- although I don't forsee any endianness-related problems.

Which of the Qt releases would you prefer stabalised?

[Comment 18 Caleb Tennis (RETIRED) 2007-02-24 17:13:51 UTC]

3.3.6-r4 would be great

[Comment 19 Caleb Tennis (RETIRED) 2007-04-11 14:45:14 UTC]

Superceded by 172746