First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 132887
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: mips team <mips@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Caleb Tennis <caleb@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 132887 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 132887 blocks: 132213
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-05-10 05:37 0000
I'd like to request stabilization of qt-3.3.6-r1.  3.3.6 has been in portage
since Mar 17, and -r1 readds some patches that were present in previous
versions but got dropped in the initial revbump to make sure they were still
needed.

------- Comment #1 From Caleb Tennis 2006-05-10 05:37:36 0000 -------
adding all arches

------- Comment #2 From Ferris McCormick 2006-05-10 07:45:56 0000 -------
I'll note that it builds and seems good for sparc, bug I don't use KDE so I am
not going to mark it stable.

------- Comment #3 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2006-05-10 18:43:51 0000 -------
Is there some reason this ebuild gets to bypass the "30 days in the tree before
being marked stable" policy?

------- Comment #4 From Markus Rothe 2006-05-11 02:46:53 0000 -------
stable on ppc64

------- Comment #5 From Caleb Tennis 2006-05-11 04:04:37 0000 -------
It's your call.  3.3.6 has been stable 30 days.  3.3.6-r1 is simply me readding
patches that were present in 3.3.4 and 3.3.5 but I initially dropped when doing
3.3.6 because I wasn't sure if they were still needed or not.

------- Comment #6 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2006-05-12 05:19:27 0000 -------
SPARC'd

------- Comment #7 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-05-12 12:43:56 0000 -------
x86 done

------- Comment #8 From Luca Barbato 2006-05-12 14:30:57 0000 -------
ppc done

------- Comment #9 From Thomas Cort (RETIRED) 2006-05-12 15:33:51 0000 -------
stable on alpha.

------- Comment #10 From Steve Yin 2006-05-25 23:44:46 0000 -------
what about stable it on amd64?

------- Comment #11 From Guy Martin 2006-05-26 03:31:06 0000 -------
Made it stable yesterday on hppa.

------- Comment #12 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-05-26 07:28:14 0000 -------
amd64 is done

------- Comment #13 From Carsten Lohrke 2006-05-28 14:49:47 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> amd64 is done

 PDEPEND.bad                    2
   x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6-r1.ebuild: amd64(default-linux/amd64/2006.0)
['~dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.6']
   x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6-r1.ebuild:
amd64(default-linux/amd64/2006.0/no-multilib) ['~dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.6']


Looks like you haven't used repoman...

------- Comment #14 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-05-30 08:52:45 0000 -------
Strange... I used repoman... just forgot to commit on the qt-unixODBC ebuild...
got it now... sorry about that

------- Comment #15 From Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) 2006-10-15 14:46:10 0000 -------
ia64 done.

------- Comment #16 From Caleb Tennis 2006-12-06 05:06:23 0000 -------
anyone on the mips team want to take a crack at this?

------- Comment #17 From Stuart Longland 2007-02-24 17:00:52 0000 -------
Just having a look now, it seems there is no qt-3.3.6-r1.  I have, however,
done some testing of qt-3.3.6-r5.  I have KDE 3.5.6 built against it, and
running quite successfully on my Loongson machine (mipsel).  I intend to test
it on big-endian MIPS too -- although I don't forsee any endianness-related
problems.

Which of the Qt releases would you prefer stabalised?

------- Comment #18 From Caleb Tennis 2007-02-24 17:13:51 0000 -------
3.3.6-r4 would be great

------- Comment #19 From Caleb Tennis 2007-04-11 14:45:14 0000 -------
Superceded by 172746

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug