First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 132349
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Printing Team <printing@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Carsten Lohrke <carlo@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 132349 depends on: 134341 Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 132349 blocks: 132213
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-05-05 07:06 0000
We need it stable for stabilization of KDE 3.5. As everyone knows this affects
multiple packages, so the stabilization needs to happen coordinated. KDE
stabilization is not happening /that/ soon, but it helps if everyone is
prepared.

------- Comment #1 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-05-05 07:17:57 0000 -------
app-text/poppler-0.5.1-r1
app-text/xpdf-3.01-r8
app-text/poppler-bindings-0.5.1-r1
>app-text/evince-0.5.1

those need to go stable simultaneously to avoid compile-problems

------- Comment #2 From Caleb Tennis 2006-05-10 05:45:45 0000 -------
Does anyone object to asking the arch teams to mark stable?

------- Comment #3 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-05-10 08:54:38 0000 -------
no objections, go ahead

------- Comment #4 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2006-05-12 15:46:52 0000 -------
For stablizing poppler-bindigs, is it known which version of qt-4* the
maintainers would prefer be stablized?

------- Comment #5 From Markus Rothe 2006-05-20 00:56:48 0000 -------
please, comment on what version of qt-4* should go stable.

------- Comment #6 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-05-20 01:50:02 0000 -------
qt herd: qt4 is needed in a stable version because poppler-bindings has a qt4
useflag and repoman needs all depends as stable. What version of qt-4* should
go stable?

------- Comment #7 From Caleb Tennis 2006-05-22 04:34:12 0000 -------
4.1.2 is fine to go stable in my opinion.  I'll probably be opening a bug in a
day or so for the request.

------- Comment #8 From Chris Gianelloni 2006-05-25 09:20:25 0000 -------
This bug is set as a blocker for bug #132213 and I've seen no request yet for
marking any version of Qt4 stable.  Should we ignore this bug or should we be
markign Qt4 stable?

Thanks

------- Comment #9 From Caleb Tennis 2006-05-25 09:24:44 0000 -------
sorry

qt4 is okay to mark stable - I just forgot to open a bug yet.  Will do so
shortly.

------- Comment #10 From Chris Gianelloni 2006-05-25 12:44:33 0000 -------
Uhh... so I marked all of this stable, including qt4, which seems to work... I
guess... anyway, x86 is done once you get around to filing the qt4 bug... =]

------- Comment #11 From Caleb Tennis 2006-05-25 12:47:56 0000 -------
Qt4 bug is at #134341

------- Comment #12 From Chris Gianelloni 2006-05-26 07:26:21 0000 -------
amd64 done... =]

------- Comment #13 From Chris Bainbridge (RETIRED) 2006-05-28 02:35:10 0000 -------
The recently marked stable poppler-0.5.1-r1 fails to compile. Please see bug
#134601. poppler-0.5.2 compiles ok.

------- Comment #14 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2006-05-29 12:47:39 0000 -------
SPARC is done.

------- Comment #15 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-08-18 18:12:32 0000 -------
long done

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug