First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 131396
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Marien Zwart (RETIRED) <marienz@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Marien Zwart (RETIRED) <marienz@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
broken-sha256.txt List of (possibly) broken stuff text/plain Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-04-27 03:59 0000 97.23 KB Details
broken-sha256-20060428-0610.txt fresh list Fri Apr 28 06:10 UTC 2006 text/plain Zac Medico 2006-04-28 00:02 0000 13.62 KB Details
broken-sha256-20060429-0549.txt list for Sat Apr 29 05:49 UTC 2006 text/plain Zac Medico 2006-04-29 00:40 0000 14.17 KB Details
broken-sha256-20060430-0349.txt list for Sun Apr 30 03:49 UTC 2006 text/plain Zac Medico 2006-04-29 21:28 0000 14.54 KB Details
broken-sha256-20060501-1953.txt list for Mon May 01 19:53 UTC 2006 text/plain Zac Medico 2006-05-01 14:18 0000 15.49 KB Details
broken-sha256-20060505-0820.txt list for Fri May 5 08:20 UTC 2006 text/plain Zac Medico 2006-05-05 02:11 0000 15.47 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 131396 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 131396 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-04-26 18:50 0000
Fallout from bug 131293 will be tracked here.

------- Comment #1 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-04-27 03:59:15 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=85598) [edit]
List of (possibly) broken stuff

First column is manifest signedness.

Second column is HORKED if the sha256 hash is wrong, UNCHECKED if a sha256 hash
was present but the file was not on the mirror this ran on so it could not be
checked.

Third column is category/package.

Fourth column is the file (can be a portdir file or distfile).

------- Comment #2 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-04-27 04:09:28 0000 -------
If your bug got duped to this one and you are not a developer:

Wait until your package is fixed (sync in a couple of hours). We will try to do
occasional status updates on this bug.

If you are a developer and hit a broken digest:

Feel free to fix it if only the SHA256 hash mismatches.

------- Comment #3 From SpanKY 2006-04-27 07:34:44 0000 -------
*** Bug 131447 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #4 From SpanKY 2006-04-27 07:35:07 0000 -------
*** Bug 131448 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #5 From SpanKY 2006-04-27 07:35:10 0000 -------
*** Bug 131449 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #6 From SpanKY 2006-04-27 07:35:18 0000 -------
*** Bug 131450 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #7 From SpanKY 2006-04-27 07:35:22 0000 -------
*** Bug 131451 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #8 From SpanKY 2006-04-27 07:35:26 0000 -------
*** Bug 131452 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #9 From SpanKY 2006-04-27 07:35:31 0000 -------
*** Bug 131453 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #10 From Jakub Moc 2006-04-27 08:25:52 0000 -------
*** Bug 131461 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #11 From Jakub Moc 2006-04-27 11:04:28 0000 -------
*** Bug 131488 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #12 From Jakub Moc 2006-04-27 14:09:47 0000 -------
*** Bug 131510 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #13 From Jakub Moc 2006-04-27 14:10:22 0000 -------
*** Bug 131509 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #14 From UncleOwen 2006-04-27 14:29:02 0000 -------
!!! /usr/portage/sys-fs/lvm2/lvm2-2.01.09-r1.ebuild
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got: 15124bffdb2b37fcb362ddfdffc87d29e8e19dcadae974327efe1bb3c06c2b7f
!!! Expected: d6a06788c8449797752f741559885de9a260c92c124ac428e3794383543bbe53

------- Comment #15 From Jeffrey Singleton 2006-04-27 15:05:49 0000 -------
This problem is still ongoing. Sorry. But waiting 2 hours and re`syncing did
not work. There are just too many invalid SHA256 hashes that an rsync would
fix, unless we completely wiped out portdir and repopulated it with the latest
portage tarball.

In fact I not only waited 2 hours, I waited more than 4 .. and still several of
my world file apps need updates, but have bad SHA256 hashes in the Manifest

So .. My question is .. IS there a fix for this or not?

------- Comment #16 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-04-27 15:18:15 0000 -------
I am sorry, but my initial "couple of hours" estimate was vastly too
optimistic. We are making progress (in alphabetical order most of kde-* and
everything above that is fixed, as well as part of net-*), and will leave this
bug open until we think everything is fixed.

------- Comment #17 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-04-27 18:12:01 0000 -------
Most of the tree is fixed now. If you still hit a failing sha256 check and your
portage tree is up to date (current cvs, aka rsync in about an hour) please
report it here.

------- Comment #18 From Zac Medico 2006-04-28 00:02:01 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=85643) [edit]
fresh list Fri Apr 28 06:10 UTC 2006

Here is a fresh list.

------- Comment #19 From Frederic Jaeckel 2006-04-28 05:38:50 0000 -------
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /usr/portage/media-sound/alsa-headers/alsa-headers-1.0.10.ebuild
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      cabe2f34e06c2df3fffbe11af60e438f4c874498a9cfd886ba846a8cd377c991
!!! Expected: 33e93e86259d993c46fe7841661728f41e5fae6757728533ce905ba2dda8e087

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/files/digest-portage-2.0.53
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      bbd40b87ac5725ca9761b4dfd3656ca180d13957b4c82823c7d22490ae08489b
!!! Expected: ff2838b2919a71fbd64f7b9fb45297c6e8b0c924b68ac943e31176e35f0f0e90

------- Comment #20 From Jakub Moc 2006-04-28 06:41:43 0000 -------
*** Bug 131570 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #21 From FieldySnuts 2006-04-28 06:51:29 0000 -------
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/distfiles/gstreamer-0.10.5.tar.bz2
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got: 1c055d04fc31ac5730a766743ece1402f93f967c8f815cd5c97112dfab8f4aa1
!!! Expected: ec85e33b37a0fad9dc9adbdcc27bffda53110c808c47a334fa788b848d36c392

Portage 2.1_pre9-r5 (default-linux/x86/2006.0, gcc-3.4.6, glibc-2.3.6-r3,
2.6.17-rc1-mm3 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.17-rc1-mm3 i686 AMD Athlon(TM) XP 1800+
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.0_pre18
distcc 2.18.3 i686-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632)
[enabled]
ccache version 2.4 [enabled]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5, 2.4.2-r1
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.17
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r7
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1-r2
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r5
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.5/env
/usr/kde/3.5/share/config /usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config
/usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/X11/xkb /usr/share/config
/var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/eselect/compiler /etc/gconf /etc/revdep-rebuild
/etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache collision-protect distcc distlocks
metadata-transfer sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.chem.wisc.edu/gentoo/
ftp://gentoo.chem.wisc.edu/gentoo/"
MAKEOPTS="-j4"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 3dnow X alsa am apache2 apm avi berkdb bitmap-fonts bzip2 cdr chroot
cli crypt dri dv dvd dvdr eds emboss encode foomaticdb fortran gdbm gif gnome
gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 hal imlib isdnlog jpeg kde kdeenablefinal libg++ libwww
mad mikmod mmx motif mp3 mpeg ncurses nls nptl ogg oggvorbis opengl oss pam
pcre pdflib perl png pppd pwdb python qt quicktime readline reflection sdl
session spell spl sse ssl tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev vorbis
xml xmms xorg xv zlib elibc_glibc input_devices_keyboard input_devices_mouse
kernel_linux userland_GNU video_cards_nvidia"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, LANG, LC_ALL,
LDFLAGS, LINGUAS

Using dev-python/pycrypto-2.0.1-r5

------- Comment #22 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-04-28 09:06:32 0000 -------
Comment #19: looks like you're not running the latest pycrypto. Please upgrade
to the latest pycrypto, and be aware portage needs to be restarted after it is
merged (so if your world upgrade pulls in pycrypto and fails on a digest
afterwards simply restart the emerge).

Comment #21: thanks, fixed in cvs.

------- Comment #23 From Ian Abbott 2006-04-28 11:39:27 0000 -------
*** Bug 131594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #24 From Paul Taylor 2006-04-28 14:24:49 0000 -------
Some more mismatches (after running "emerge --resync"):

x11-libs/openmotif-2.2.3-r9:

!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/x11-libs/openmotif/openmotif-2.2.3-r7.ebuild
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got: 822ebd816f1e66ae7548ced167d16599ee9906ec32e452be29542171d22ffb92
!!! Expected: c2e26a1a6ac3af730ad8445287fe4cda97226d57dd96822bc60ab0a746c02b23

x11-misc/rss-glx-0.8.0-r3:

!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/x11-misc/rss-glx/rss-glx-0.8.0-r2.ebuild
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got: 10c043b4434a0fce4ad2e3f32fe9862ccd076659a1e6c37bef67ef638dd6154a
!!! Expected: 4a3f7d8fd95ddbdae60aca7ebf769c8579250f0c8e71e3f9a59a434c2cc1b5b7

------- Comment #25 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-04-28 16:23:00 0000 -------
comment #24: both fixed, thanks.

------- Comment #26 From Nathan Sullivan 2006-04-29 00:26:30 0000 -------
>>> Emerging (2 of 3) sys-apps/portage-2.1_pre9-r5 to /
>>> checking ebuild checksums
>>> checking auxfile checksums
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/files/2.1_pre7/1130_r3087_bug_129098.patch
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got: e7822a02fa4e2eaa0fa87e081d442866b66408520bac4e29e4927ad7439636e9
!!! Expected: 5cf3d33b7d4768914e4bd5f7ffb37ab33e984184f138ef9b82c3a46fac1969b0

------- Comment #27 From Zac Medico 2006-04-29 00:40:31 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=85737) [edit]
list for Sat Apr 29 05:49 UTC 2006

New list

------- Comment #28 From Zac Medico 2006-04-29 00:42:32 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #26)
> >>> Emerging (2 of 3) sys-apps/portage-2.1_pre9-r5 to /
> >>> checking ebuild checksums
> >>> checking auxfile checksums
> !!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/files/2.1_pre7/1130_r3087_bug_129098.patch
> !!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
> !!! Got: e7822a02fa4e2eaa0fa87e081d442866b66408520bac4e29e4927ad7439636e9
> !!! Expected: 5cf3d33b7d4768914e4bd5f7ffb37ab33e984184f138ef9b82c3a46fac1969b0
> 

Try again.  You probably had the old version of pycrypto still loaded in memory
(if it was #1 in the merge list).

------- Comment #29 From Nathan Sullivan 2006-04-29 01:19:19 0000 -------
  Sat Apr 29 17:20:20 2006 >>> dev-python/pycrypto-2.0.1-r5

looks like your right :)

thx.

------- Comment #30 From Tim Boundy 2006-04-29 06:38:51 0000 -------
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/sys-libs/timezone-data/timezone-data-2006a.ebuild
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got: d1aaab6eb3130d2ad515bea79dd6d2bde811a4855820569b604e1f48e0085ecf
!!! Expected: 4b95d4cd18a220672516cdf0fe9db15101fc9f4e6aab19adae843f67f952affe

------- Comment #31 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-04-29 09:45:36 0000 -------
Comment #30: That was fixed about 40 hours ago, please sync.

------- Comment #32 From Zac Medico 2006-04-29 21:28:00 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=85808) [edit]
list for Sun Apr 30 03:49 UTC 2006

------- Comment #33 From dark_mail@gmx.net 2006-05-01 02:05:14 0000 -------
!!!    /usr/portage/media-libs/tiff/files/tiff-3.7.1-tiffdump.patch
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      3697a051dd64fbfb2c05971bd04089c35ff202461287ed7c9663d12c0397aecb
!!! Expected: a4ad4ca4599713f71474225f0eb6191a913d01db1ff06569715d27f7afb96319

------- Comment #34 From Jakub Moc 2006-05-01 05:26:04 0000 -------
*** Bug 131888 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #35 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-05-01 05:51:27 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #33)
> !!!    /usr/portage/media-libs/tiff/files/tiff-3.7.1-tiffdump.patch
> !!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
> !!! Got:      3697a051dd64fbfb2c05971bd04089c35ff202461287ed7c9663d12c0397aecb
> !!! Expected: a4ad4ca4599713f71474225f0eb6191a913d01db1ff06569715d27f7afb96319

The "Expected" value is the value I actually get for the file, according to the
cvs history your "Got" value is the one you get from a broken pycrypto. Are you
on the latest (2.0.1-r5) pycrypto? Did emerge get restarted after you upgraded
to that version?

------- Comment #36 From dark_mail@gmx.net 2006-05-01 10:52:15 0000 -------
Sorry, you are right.
I still had the -r4 version of pycrypto.

------- Comment #37 From Zac Medico 2006-05-01 14:18:23 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=85953) [edit]
list for Mon May 01 19:53 UTC 2006

------- Comment #38 From Jakub Moc 2006-05-01 23:20:41 0000 -------
*** Bug 131983 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #39 From darkgrave@gmail.com 2006-05-02 02:08:29 0000 -------
I found greater problems than digests mismatch due to bad sha256sum. There is
also filesize mismatching in current CVS for 'sys-apps/dbus-0.23.4-r1' and dbus
Manifest file. Downloaded CVS file: 3658 bytes, Manifest says 3639 bytes.

I'm writing here because I think this problem may be related with digests
mismatches.

------- Comment #40 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-05-02 04:54:22 0000 -------
Comment #39: I am unable to reproduce. The file dbus-0.23.4-r1.ebuild is 3639
bytes in my cvs checkout, hasn't been touched for the last 3 weeks according to
cvs log, and passes digest checks. How did you get this file? Does a sync make
the problem go away?

------- Comment #41 From Alan Hourihane 2006-05-03 00:17:42 0000 -------
When emerging python 2.4.3 on alpha I get this...

!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /usr/portage/dev-lang/python/files/digest-python-2.4.3
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      cb1f85d43ffcb62f214711b3ab7231ad711ac382ab729dc9013e4e482eaaf238
!!! Expected: 3f77c805317ac37a5bbe788bc0ad4b723c3584c0d676d6ee4e2040291cb4177d

------- Comment #42 From Alan Hourihane 2006-05-03 00:23:15 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #41)
> When emerging python 2.4.3 on alpha I get this...
> 
> !!! Digest verification Failed:
> !!!    /usr/portage/dev-lang/python/files/digest-python-2.4.3
> !!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
> !!! Got:      cb1f85d43ffcb62f214711b3ab7231ad711ac382ab729dc9013e4e482eaaf238
> !!! Expected: 3f77c805317ac37a5bbe788bc0ad4b723c3584c0d676d6ee4e2040291cb4177d

Actually, because of the dependencies, the pycrypto module wouldn't have been
updated before python 2.4.3 got emerged using a traditional 'emerge -uD world'.

So I had to emerge pycrypto manually before issuing the -uD world again. Now
it's fine.

------- Comment #43 From Ricardo Cordeiro 2006-05-03 02:24:29 0000 -------
>>> Emerging (1 of 15) media-libs/mesa-6.5-r3 to /
>>> checksums files   ;-) mesa-6.5-r3.ebuild
>>> checksums files   ;-) mesa-6.4.2-r2.ebuild
>>> checksums files   ;-) files/64bit-fix-indirect-vertex-array.patch

!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!   
/usr/portage/media-libs/mesa/files/6.5-re-order-context-destruction.patch!!!
Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      64fc2ec01fb786a5f2d861449e6243bf41e6c4e40031c9713b5ad34e3a6fcde9
!!! Expected: dda980be89d14df3659c0d409c56e4ccd6a03afdca2e8edc502845943423a600

Portage tree was synced a minute earlier.

------- Comment #44 From Jakub Moc 2006-05-03 07:23:47 0000 -------
*** Bug 132128 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #45 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-05-03 09:00:35 0000 -------
Comment #43: The "expected" value seems to be accurate. Perhaps you need to
upgrade pycrypto?

------- Comment #46 From Ricardo Cordeiro 2006-05-03 10:01:03 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #45)
> Comment #43: The "expected" value seems to be accurate. Perhaps you need to
> upgrade pycrypto?
> 

I did check the version before, but missread r4 for r5. Sorry about that.

Upgraded, resynced and it worked.

------- Comment #47 From Ricardo Cordeiro 2006-05-03 10:15:08 0000 -------
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /usr/portage/media-libs/tiff/files/tiff-3.7.1-tiffdump.patch
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      a4ad4ca4599713f71474225f0eb6191a913d01db1ff06569715d27f7afb96319
!!! Expected: 3697a051dd64fbfb2c05971bd04089c35ff202461287ed7c9663d12c0397aecb

this one is sticky.

------- Comment #48 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-05-03 10:30:42 0000 -------
Comment #47: thanks for reporting, fixed in cvs.

------- Comment #49 From Jakub Moc 2006-05-04 02:31:50 0000 -------
*** Bug 132218 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #50 From Jakub Moc 2006-05-04 10:13:14 0000 -------
*** Bug 132272 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #51 From Zac Medico 2006-05-05 02:11:12 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=86190) [edit]
list for Fri May  5 08:20 UTC 2006

------- Comment #52 From Chris 2006-05-05 10:24:10 0000 -------
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /usr/portage/www-client/mozilla-firefox/mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.2.ebuild
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      62f0d54c92f911f8be2544f10b385789da0aa9837122333a9d05bd3c630714e1
!!! Expected: 65eb7a7e41effc9347256b9afd395bdc092df94f9fef54a8a00b4ebd98cfd1d1

!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /usr/portage/sys-apps/sandbox/files/digest-sandbox-1.2.12
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      7a1fcb1f51ed88f84ded15c6267769ab59f5a4f06e026a34101cf6aef9152c3c
!!! Expected: 458a2a6625d973b66b077631d56a16d875742fa5bc4fa1d950cb3033b820981b

------- Comment #53 From Tobias Schlitt 2006-05-05 12:54:00 0000 -------
>>> Emerging (1 of 33) dev-libs/openssl-0.9.7j to /
>>> checking ebuild checksums
>>> checking auxfile checksums
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-0.9.8-ppc64.patch
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got: b38d4178098df3c2f487a542035d5de747f8c2d2a921f2d85eea324518dc2064
!!! Expected: 9e521f5b76a46a56414cf49cde452f4bd96c9f42f5ac30257c0404808b125886

------- Comment #54 From Christian Gut 2006-05-07 00:11:40 0000 -------
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc/files/digest-gcc-3.2.2
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      c15c963fc6834d8ae7cbc231c3678eafbf85597749353cc5c0a697b87abaa688
!!! Expected: 2c69fc1e2cb4b30c70b8ce8bde9fc84010569f1b2a7eb7700877d19dc030c727

------- Comment #55 From Jakub Moc 2006-05-08 10:21:10 0000 -------
*** Bug 132691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #56 From Attila Jecs 2006-05-09 08:57:30 0000 -------
glibc-2.4-r1
SHA256
files/nsswitch.conf

------- Comment #57 From Neil Skrypuch 2006-05-10 00:30:58 0000 -------
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /var/portage/distfiles/OOO_2_0_2-core.tar.bz2
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      e938a4edb6d11ef4a634a18ad55c6d9e9a371a5ab9771d17e71832fbb12cc230
!!! Expected: e9afb8806b323880a99c5fd323a5702a86a58ce9f2ba024ad09846d847e7bd53

------- Comment #58 From Neil Skrypuch 2006-05-10 04:52:40 0000 -------
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /var/portage/sys-libs/glibc/files/nsswitch.conf
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      21c07e3c3a6ed59c6bfca84b6e4a4931a82c745fd4d1ce136c69a6c03418b11c
!!! Expected: 6c38b8642d5da884327ad678d0351d57be3621562253bd9711394bad87e45e2d

(glibc-2.3.6-r3)

------- Comment #59 From Jakub Moc 2006-05-10 11:27:39 0000 -------
*** Bug 132906 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #60 From Chester Wisniewski 2006-05-10 16:17:04 0000 -------
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /usr/portage/sys-boot/grub/grub-0.96-r2.ebuild
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      76368c0b90e303141a46032edadbb251f735e1f98a5113bf7635e47457c52670
!!! Expected: 3be87c06ae7f39ea3ac8c00befab972f5c1b56da31d9db7d1aede49a8ae1f246

------- Comment #61 From Chester Wisniewski 2006-05-10 16:21:57 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #60)
> !!! Digest verification Failed:
> !!!    /usr/portage/sys-boot/grub/grub-0.96-r2.ebuild
> !!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
> !!! Got:      76368c0b90e303141a46032edadbb251f735e1f98a5113bf7635e47457c52670
> !!! Expected: 3be87c06ae7f39ea3ac8c00befab972f5c1b56da31d9db7d1aede49a8ae1f246
> 

I had old pycrypto. Retrying. Sorry for not reading the bug... :( 

------- Comment #62 From Jakub Moc 2006-05-11 15:08:00 0000 -------
*** Bug 133063 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #63 From Andrey_KA 2006-05-11 22:42:48 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #58)
> !!! Digest verification Failed:
> !!!    /var/portage/sys-libs/glibc/files/nsswitch.conf
> !!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
> !!! Got:      21c07e3c3a6ed59c6bfca84b6e4a4931a82c745fd4d1ce136c69a6c03418b11c
> !!! Expected: 6c38b8642d5da884327ad678d0351d57be3621562253bd9711394bad87e45e2d
> 
> (glibc-2.3.6-r3)
> 

I had this bug when did emerge -Dv --update system
But after removing --deep key (emerge -v --update system) bug resolved
Think after updating pycrypto problems resolves

------- Comment #64 From georgia_tech_swagger 2006-05-12 01:28:30 0000 -------
# emerge xorg-x11
Calculating dependencies... done!
>>> Emerging (1 of 104) x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.2 to /
>>> checking ebuild checksums ;-)
>>> checking auxfile checksums ;-)
>>> checking miscfile checksums ;-)
>>> checking kbproto-1.0.2.tar.bz2
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/distfiles/kbproto-1.0.2.tar.bz2
!!! Reason: Failed on RMD160 verification
!!! Got: 3e3ab52a8354ba0f9de2d392e75f84764f38d628
!!! Expected: dfc8692c0f9d6bee748a8ad469b4eba7381d72c4

Portage:  2.1_pre10-r5  
pycrypto:  2.0.1-r5

------- Comment #65 From georgia_tech_swagger 2006-05-12 01:56:04 0000 -------
Disregard previous comment...  I tried removing kbproto from distfiles folder
three times... and trying to get things to work I removed it yet again and it
worked.... :-/   yeaaaa....

------- Comment #66 From DEMAINE Benoît-Pierre, aka DoubleHP 2006-05-12 02:03:08 0000 -------
as I said in Bug 133063 :

ebuild /usr/portage/media-sound/alsa-headers/alsa-headers-1.0.10.ebuild 
manifest

is a command to fix any broken ebuild or checksum files. This allowed me to fix
3 more broken problems in 5s each.

------- Comment #67 From Ian Abbott 2006-05-12 02:16:11 0000 -------
(in reply to Comment #66)
> as I said in Bug 133063 :
> 
> ebuild /usr/portage/media-sound/alsa-headers/alsa-headers-1.0.10.ebuild manifest
> 
> is a command to fix any broken ebuild or checksum files. This allowed me to fix
> 3 more broken problems in 5s each.

Well you could do that *after* reporting the bad checksum here!

------- Comment #68 From UncleOwen 2006-05-12 08:20:09 0000 -------
It's also a good way to make sure compromised software _does_ get onto your
system, if you do it without thinking.

------- Comment #69 From Jakub Moc 2006-05-12 08:36:49 0000 -------
*** Bug 133125 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #70 From DEMAINE Benoît-Pierre, aka DoubleHP 2006-05-12 22:03:50 0000 -------
root@moon_gen:~# emerge -v1 rpm2targz
Calculating dependencies... done!
>>> Emerging (1 of 1) app-arch/rpm2targz-9.0-r5 to /
mv: cannot stat `/mnt/big/portage/rpm2targz-9.0-r5/temp/environment': No such
file or directory
>>> checksums files   ;-) rpm2targz-9.0-r3.ebuild
>>> checksums files   ;-) rpm2targz-9.0-r2.ebuild
>>> checksums files   ;-) rpm2targz-9.0-r4.ebuild

!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /usr/portage/app-arch/rpm2targz/rpm2targz-9.0-r5.ebuild
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      d5a231e191c4133589e8a636ff80c932672d6344d248fbe87c5ed122936ceeec
!!! Expected: 9eecf430164b9a38ec2012e3bae8cd749472f92a440d8f112f0a24c66a439f8e

>>> Please ensure you have sync'd properly. Please try 'emerge sync' and
>>> optionally examine the file(s) for corruption. A sync will fix most cases.

*******************************************************

root@moon_gen:~# ebuild /usr/portage/app-arch/rpm2targz/rpm2targz-9.0-r5.ebuild
manifest
>>> Generating the manifest file...

does fix.

------- Comment #71 From DEMAINE Benoît-Pierre, aka DoubleHP 2006-05-12 22:10:30 0000 -------
>>> checksums files   ;-) gtk+-2.8.16.ebuild
>>> checksums files   ;-) gtk+-2.8.8.ebuild

!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /usr/portage/x11-libs/gtk+/gtk+-2.8.17.ebuild
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      4be27fbd7309eed7d6bb9154456b81d56ed0389a215ef35a5a7c8731dd9344e1
!!! Expected: d4896fb5ede1ffaf9a19c672e1e89cce4d483765ff36c5e210998272cb97d9c1

same fix.

------- Comment #72 From DEMAINE Benoît-Pierre, aka DoubleHP 2006-05-12 23:15:54 0000 -------
root@moon_gen:/home/dhp# emerge -v1 vlc
Calculating dependencies... done!
>>> Emerging (1 of 1) media-video/vlc-0.8.5 to /
mv: cannot stat `/mnt/big/portage/vlc-0.8.5/temp/environment': No such file or
directory
>>> checksums files   ;-) vlc-0.8.4a-r1.ebuild

!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /usr/portage/media-video/vlc/vlc-0.8.4a.ebuild
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      5c426be79983614951683896c6e38e3febb3efb7c230699302ede70c2b6000e7
!!! Expected: d2339f58717e338330870a65c1cbb18e6d3b0e34e23cdaf0a14b9e21cfb1e310

>>> Please ensure you have sync'd properly. Please try 'emerge sync' and
>>> optionally examine the file(s) for corruption. A sync will fix most cases.

fix is same as usual.

------- Comment #73 From DEMAINE Benoît-Pierre, aka DoubleHP 2006-05-13 05:23:53 0000 -------
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /usr/portage/media-libs/tiff/files/tiff-3.7.1-tiffdump.patch
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      3697a051dd64fbfb2c05971bd04089c35ff202461287ed7c9663d12c0397aecb
!!! Expected: a4ad4ca4599713f71474225f0eb6191a913d01db1ff06569715d27f7afb96319

------- Comment #74 From DEMAINE Benoît-Pierre, aka DoubleHP 2006-05-13 10:01:02 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #53)
> !!! /usr/portage/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-0.9.8-ppc64.patch
> !!! Got: b38d4178098df3c2f487a542035d5de747f8c2d2a921f2d85eea324518dc2064
> !!! Expected: 9e521f5b76a46a56414cf49cde452f4bd96c9f42f5ac30257c0404808b125886

!!!    /usr/portage/dev-libs/openssl/files/digest-openssl-0.9.6m
!!! Got:      5a5fedfc3009915054be70ad6f7f15089099b3aeaa789e0826ca995ac07e4316
!!! Expected: 9358151d15b51644133f46a752034b8c913d62c76c7eb884851e7aa54b5e4053

------- Comment #75 From Ian Abbott 2006-05-13 13:50:29 0000 -------
(In reply to Comment #68)
> It's also a good way to make sure compromised software _does_ get onto your
> system, if you do it without thinking.

Yes, you should only update the manifest if you're sure it's a bogus SHA256
checksum and the other checksums are okay.  It's useful to get out of a hole
and continue emerging without having to wait for it to be fixed in portage CVS.
 But to reiterate, the bad checksums should be reported here as well!

------- Comment #76 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-05-14 08:30:39 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #71)
> !!! Got:      4be27fbd7309eed7d6bb9154456b81d56ed0389a215ef35a5a7c8731dd9344e1
> !!! Expected: d4896fb5ede1ffaf9a19c672e1e89cce4d483765ff36c5e210998272cb97d9c1


That "expected" value is the correct one. Are you sure you are on the latest
pycrypto?

------- Comment #77 From solar 2006-05-14 09:17:08 0000 -------
pycrypto-2.0.1-r5[0]: testing and stabilization bug filed. bug 133299

------- Comment #78 From DEMAINE Benoît-Pierre, aka DoubleHP 2006-05-14 12:40:52 0000 -------
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/media-video/vlc/vlc-0.8.4a.ebuild
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got: d2339f58717e338330870a65c1cbb18e6d3b0e34e23cdaf0a14b9e21cfb1e310
!!! Expected: 5c426be79983614951683896c6e38e3febb3efb7c230699302ede70c2b6000e7

------- Comment #79 From DEMAINE Benoît-Pierre, aka DoubleHP 2006-05-14 13:15:41 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #76)
> (In reply to comment #71)
> > !!! Got:      4be27fbd7309eed7d6bb9154456b81d56ed0389a215ef35a5a7c8731dd9344e1
> > !!! Expected: d4896fb5ede1ffaf9a19c672e1e89cce4d483765ff36c5e210998272cb97d9c1
> 
> 
> That "expected" value is the correct one. Are you sure you are on the latest
> pycrypto?
> 

I have latest r5 since 2006 may 13rd, 19:20; FYI I am in France/Paris, and
comment #71 is said to be posted 2006-05-12 22:10

so by that time I had not the latest version, but any further ones will. I had
over 170 updates to do last week; emerge world did not put portage nor pycrypto
as urgent ones, so that it took days before upgrades. Genlop still says me I
have over 30h of compile to do ... but I keep posting SHA problems before I fix
them locally.

After I compleeted upgrades, I ll esync, then check again all SHA that I said
here to be bad, see whats around.

------- Comment #80 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-05-15 05:28:14 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #78)
> !!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/media-video/vlc/vlc-0.8.4a.ebuild
> !!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
> !!! Got: d2339f58717e338330870a65c1cbb18e6d3b0e34e23cdaf0a14b9e21cfb1e310
> !!! Expected: 5c426be79983614951683896c6e38e3febb3efb7c230699302ede70c2b6000e7
> 

That makes no sense. Your "Got" value is correct, but it is also the one in the
Manifest at the moment and in all the previous revisions I've checked. Perhaps
you redigested this one with a broken pycrypto and it's now failing with an
unbroken pycrypto?

Before you report any more of these can you please do the following:

- Make sure your portage tree is current and has no local changes ("emerge
sync" will do this).
- Make sure you are on a sufficiently recent pycrypto.
- Make sure portage was restarted after that pycrypto was upgraded.

Thanks.

------- Comment #81 From Jakub Moc 2006-05-15 08:40:30 0000 -------
*** Bug 133385 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #82 From Whit Blauvelt 2006-05-15 09:17:00 0000 -------
Would it be possible to be sure that on any "emerge -u" on a system which has a
known-"broken" pycrypto that pycrypto will be emerged first, and then perhaps
the emerge will be restarted in the same way it does if a new portage has been
emerged?

------- Comment #83 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-05-15 15:54:29 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #82)
> Would it be possible to be sure that on any "emerge -u" on a system which has a
> known-"broken" pycrypto that pycrypto will be emerged first, and then perhaps
> the emerge will be restarted in the same way it does if a new portage has been
> emerged?

If I knew a sensible way to do that I would probably have done it by now :)

Most workarounds (like making portage ignore sha256 digests for files with a
size that's susceptible to this pycrypto bug) involve changing portage, so they
don't really help any more than simply upgrading portage now does already
(since that will pull in the right pycrypto and trigger a reload of portage).

I do not know a non-insane way to make sure the portage upgrade is pulled first
(other than throwing in some portage dependencies in various important places
but that is evil and ugly). Suggestions on non-insane ways to accomplish this
are appreciated.

------- Comment #84 From John M. Drescher 2006-05-22 05:36:17 0000 -------
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/local/portage/games-strategy/glest/glest-2.0.0.ebuild
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got: 0c3895383d33b3f3fd4d434b622e6a284ad64b6e9ac9d26205d1a36df0abcf46
!!! Expected: 2b9182a51dd6232db6ea0ba3dbd36e2a6091e88a2a435958199f61f0e2973dc7

------- Comment #85 From John M. Drescher 2006-05-22 05:38:09 0000 -------
Sorry please forget about glest. I see that this was an ebuild I bumped...

------- Comment #86 From Stefan de Konink 2006-05-24 17:33:41 0000 -------
Very much x packages are broken lets start with xextproto.

------- Comment #87 From Stefan de Konink 2006-05-24 17:37:17 0000 -------
xcmiscproto

------- Comment #88 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-05-24 18:06:23 0000 -------
Please make sure these still fail after removing the copy from
/usr/portage/distfiles and refetching it. The tarballs changed between an xorg
7 release candidate and the final release without a rename. If you still have
old tarballs in /usr/portage/distfiles they will cause digest failures with the
current Manifest/digest files.

------- Comment #89 From Stefan de Konink 2006-05-25 09:44:29 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #88)
> Please make sure these still fail after removing the copy from
> /usr/portage/distfiles and refetching it. The tarballs changed between an xorg
> 7 release candidate and the final release without a rename. If you still have
> old tarballs in /usr/portage/distfiles they will cause digest failures with the
> current Manifest/digest files.

You are right. This why isn't portage anticipating on this? Is it a bug?

------- Comment #90 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-05-25 11:42:26 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #89)
> (In reply to comment #88)
> You are right. This why isn't portage anticipating on this? Is it a bug?

Portage does not usually try to remove and refetch a distfile if the digest
does not match. This could be considered a missing feature. For now it's good
practice to remove and refetch a distfile if the digest check fails.

This is particularly easy to hit on xorg 7 because upstream changed the
tarballs  without renaming them (which really should not happen). If you have
tarballs from that time around (as far as I know that means you fetched them
while xorg 7 was in package.mask) you will need to remove them.

------- Comment #91 From Ian Abbott 2006-05-26 23:59:05 0000 -------
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/x11-drivers/ati-drivers/files/fglrx-2.6.12-pci_name.patch
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got: 8dc2a7d9cdf449fd040ed9bb6b7f891f3885cf33a35a39e858b8072eb505f67a
!!! Expected: 80300e0810a35f42e6d1323c6aef1cd1a4d6c40ebf8d508269c5d06f3cc79817

Shouldn't all devs ('lu_zero' in this case) be using the correct pycrypto by
now?

------- Comment #92 From Jakub Moc 2006-05-27 05:09:47 0000 -------
*** Bug 134511 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #93 From Paul Taylor 2006-05-29 23:57:58 0000 -------
Should MD5 hash verification failures be filed here, or is this a separate bug?

The following packages have ebuilds that fail verification:
   kde-base/kstars-3.5.2
   kde-base/kdeartwork-kscreensaver-3.5.2
   kde-base/libkdeedu-3.5.2
   kde-base/kontact-3.5.2

Resyncing has not resolved the problem; there may be other similarly affected
packages that I don't have installed (I found them using "emerge -ef world".)

------- Comment #94 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-05-30 02:13:11 0000 -------
I'm marking this "fixed" because by now the tree itself is fixed and devs have
upgraded so it shouldn't be broken by this again. The problem will only
resurface if a dev who's running ~arch portage commits something while not
having upgraded since this bug was discovered.

comment #93: Not this bug. You should file one if it has not been fixed yet,
but from cvs logs this was fixed about 2 hours ago, so an "emerge sync" should
fix it now.

------- Comment #95 From Ian Abbott 2006-05-30 02:34:00 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #94)
> I'm marking this "fixed" because by now the tree itself is fixed and devs have
> upgraded so it shouldn't be broken by this again. The problem will only
> resurface if a dev who's running ~arch portage commits something while not
> having upgraded since this bug was discovered.

So is the best way to catch those developers to file package-specific bugs? 
I'll do that in the case of ati-drivers (see comment #91) unless someone else
has beat me to it!

------- Comment #96 From Martin Mokrejs 2006-12-18 13:06:30 0000 -------
It took me a week of --sync-ing my portage tree to figure out why I cannot
upgrade anymore because of bad checksums. After I tried to find where does the
sha256sum from I found newer coreutils provide sha256sum. After a copying that
binary from a working machine to the problematic one I found the sha256sum is
the one reported to be expected by emerge, and that the one calculated by
emerge is wrong. So I finally got to this bugreport. I have about 12 othe
rmachines in exactly same stage. Now I finally see I have to do 'emerge -uO
pycrypto' otherwise I will never get ahead. The below output shows my setup and
that sha256sum from a newer machine computes correctly on the bad host. As I
said, upgrading pycrypto to -r5 fixed my problem. Please improve portage
dependencies/logic to upgrade pycrypto before it attempts any othe rpackage.
For example, in my case it always tries gettext or bash first. :(

phylo1 etc # emerge -uO autoconf

Calculating dependencies... done!
>>> Emerging (1 of 1) sys-devel/autoconf-2.61 to /
>>> Downloading http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/autoconf-2.61.tar.gz
--23:03:28--  http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/autoconf-2.61.tar.gz
           => `/usr/portage/distfiles/autoconf-2.61.tar.gz'
Resolving distfiles.gentoo.org... 64.50.236.52, 64.50.238.52, 156.56.247.195,
...
Connecting to distfiles.gentoo.org|64.50.236.52|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 1,396,855 (1.3M) [application/x-gzip]

100%[==========================================================================================================================================================================================>]
1,396,855    463.87K/s             

23:03:32 (462.63 KB/s) - `/usr/portage/distfiles/autoconf-2.61.tar.gz' saved
[1396855/1396855]

>>> checksums files   ;-) autoconf-2.59-r7.ebuild
>>> checksums files   ;-) autoconf-2.13.ebuild
>>> checksums files   ;-) autoconf-2.60.ebuild
>>> checksums files   ;-) autoconf-2.61.ebuild
>>> checksums files   ;-) files/autoconf-2.13-gentoo.patch
>>> checksums files   ;-) files/digest-autoconf-2.13
>>> checksums files   ;-) files/autoconf-2.13-destdir.patch
>>> checksums files   ;-) files/digest-autoconf-2.59-r7
>>> checksums files   ;-) files/autoconf-2.59-more-quotes.patch
>>> checksums files   ;-) files/autoconf-2.60-tests.patch
>>> checksums files   ;-) files/digest-autoconf-2.60
>>> checksums files   ;-) files/digest-autoconf-2.61

!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!    /usr/portage/distfiles/autoconf-2.61.tar.gz
!!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification
!!! Got:      6557534b0d785fddb18c02de222c67bb4de556651005b5e56ead392d42deb79d
!!! Expected: 9d14f2ed0d1b6f8180498a66517f511c7c49c870d6873219a3ff4b8b3082a68b

phylo1 etc # sha256sum /usr/portage/distfiles/autoconf-2.61.tar.gz
9d14f2ed0d1b6f8180498a66517f511c7c49c870d6873219a3ff4b8b3082a68b 
/usr/portage/distfiles/autoconf-2.61.tar.gz
phylo1 etc # emerge -s pycrypto

Searching...   
[ Results for search key : pycrypto ]
[ Applications found : 1 ]

*  dev-python/pycrypto
      Latest version available: 2.0.1-r5
      Latest version installed: 2.0.1-r4
      Size of files: 452 kB
      Homepage:      http://www.amk.ca/python/code/crypto.html
      Description:   Python Cryptography Toolkit
      License:       freedist


phylo1 etc # 
# emerge --info

Portage 2.1_pre5-r4 (default-linux/x86/2006.1, gcc-3.4.5, glibc-2.3.6-r3,
2.6.15-rc5 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.15-rc5 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.0_pre16
app-admin/eselect-compiler: [Not Present]
dev-java/java-config: [Not Present]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5, 2.4.2-r1
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
dev-util/ccache:     [Not Present]
dev-util/confcache:  [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.18.1
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1-r2
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.13-r1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r3
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O3 -march=pentium4 -mmmx -msse -msse2 -msse3 -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/spool/PBS /var/qmail/alias /var/qmail/control
/var/spool/PBS"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -mcpu=i686 -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig distlocks sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://distfiles.gentoo.org
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 FFmpeg X Xaw3d aalib acpi alsa apache2 avi berkdb bidi bitmap-fonts
caca cdr cli cracklib crypt cscope curl dba divx divx4 divx4linux divx5
divx5linux dlloader dri dvd dvdr dvdread emacs emacs-w3 encode f77 faad faad2
fam fame ffmpeg flash fortran fvwm fvwm2 gb gd gdbm ggi gif gpm gtk gtk2
gtkhtml i8x0 icc iconv imagemagick imlib imlib2 innodb ipv6 isdnlog ithreads
java javascript jpeg kerberos lcms leim libg++ libwww live lzo mad mcal mesa
mikmod mmx mmx2 motif mozilla mpeg mule mysql ncurses network nls nptl nptlonly
opengl pam pcre pda pdflib perl plotutils plugin png ppds pppd pthread pthreads
python qt qtx quicktime readline reflection rtc samba scp sdl server session
slp spell spl sse sse2 sse3 ssl tcltk tcpd tetex theora thread threads tiff
truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode usb v4l v4l2 win32 winvidix
wmf xml xml2 xorg xosd xv xvid xvmc zeo zlib elibc_glibc input_devices_keyboard
input_devices_mouse input_devices_evdev kernel_linux userland_GNU
video_cards_radeon"
Unset:  CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS,
LINGUAS, MAKEOPTS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug