First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 131206
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: VERIFIED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Tom Martin (RETIRED) <slarti@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar <dulmandakh@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 131206 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 131206 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.





View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-04-25 04:46 0000
error message is:

 * Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE!  Value for $EPATCH_SOURCE is:
 *
 *  
/usr/portage/mail-client/mail-notification/files/mail-notification-2.0-evolution-r1.diff
 *   ( mail-notification-2.0-evolution-r1.diff )

in mail-notification-2.0.ebuild:
EVO_INSTALLED="$(best_version mail-client/evolution)"
EVO_VERSION=${EVO_INSTALLED##*-}
EVO_VERSION=$(get_version_component_range 1-2 ${EVO_VERSION})

these lines must determine major evolution version such as 2.4 or 2.6, but
giving minor version such as r1.

there is
/usr/portage/mail-client/mail-notification/files/mail-notification-2.0-evolution-2.6.diff

------- Comment #1 From Tom Martin (RETIRED) 2006-04-25 10:04:04 0000 -------
I simplified the $EVO_VERSION gunk; should be working now.

Thanks for the bug report.

------- Comment #2 From DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar 2006-04-25 18:03:21 0000 -------
Synced my portage tree on apr 26, but still not working and gave me another
error

 * Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE!  Value for $EPATCH_SOURCE is:
 *
 *  
/usr/portage/mail-client/mail-notification/files/mail-notification-2.0-evolution-mail-client.diff
 *   ( mail-notification-2.0-evolution-mail-client.diff )


seems something problematic :D

------- Comment #3 From Tom Martin (RETIRED) 2006-04-26 09:11:42 0000 -------
Doh. That really shouldn't be happening. I'll have another look.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug