First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 130529
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: IA-64 team <ia64@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Eric Edgar (RETIRED) <rocket@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 130529 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 130529 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-04-19 15:06 0000
I know this has only been in the tree for a short period of time.  However,
this package has been stable upstream for quite some time and it is needed to
resolve a device-mapper upgrade downgrade circular dependancy issue.  I have
masked the clvm,cman,gulm use flags from all arches except x86 so the
clustering aspects of this ebuild should not be enabled and need to be
stabilized at this time.  If you guys need anything let me know.

------- Comment #1 From Eric Edgar (RETIRED) 2006-04-21 12:42:14 0000 -------
Updating this to the newest lvm2 with the vgid parsing bug fixed.

------- Comment #2 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-04-22 18:46:34 0000 -------
How do I test all of the clustering on x86?

To mark lvm2 stable here on x86 I also need to mark the following, correct?

M ccs/ccs-1.01.00.ebuild
M cman/cman-1.01.00.ebuild
M cman-headers/cman-headers-1.01.00.ebuild
M dlm/dlm-1.01.00.ebuild
M dlm-headers/dlm-headers-1.01.00.ebuild
M gulm/gulm-1.00.00.ebuild
M magma/magma-1.01.00.ebuild

I've tested device-mapper and lvm2 in a virtual machine and they appear fine,
but the clustering stuff is beyond my extremely limited knowlege of lvm.  Some
assistance would be appreciated.

------- Comment #3 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2006-04-24 07:01:18 0000 -------
pwn3d!
hppa and sparc stable.
Chris: you'll probably need GFS and spread the thing across two or more boxes,
to get an idea just see http://linux.sys-con.com/read/166309.htm
And that's the reason i became a biatch and said i doubted some arch teams
really tested clustering as it should be done.

------- Comment #4 From Eric Edgar (RETIRED) 2006-04-24 11:07:40 0000 -------
bumping this to 2.02.05 as it contains everything that .04-r1 had plus a fix
for
invalidating a cache.

 "Invalidate cache if composition of VG changed externally"

This .05 release is the official response to the broken .03 and .04 version of
lvm and was released to fix both the bug listed above and the 
"Fix vgid string termination in recent cache code." problem that the patch in
.04-r1 resolved.

------- Comment #5 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-04-25 07:27:49 0000 -------
Added sparc and hppa back for comment #4

------- Comment #6 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2006-04-25 11:48:31 0000 -------
sparc stable, i'll do hppa later.

------- Comment #7 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-04-25 17:08:00 0000 -------
Well, x86 is done... and for the record, you suck.  :P

------- Comment #8 From Joshua Kinard 2006-04-26 20:03:55 0000 -------
The mips team doth annoint this bug with the mips keyword of stability +1.

------- Comment #9 From Markus Rothe 2006-05-01 04:22:32 0000 -------
stable on ppc64

------- Comment #10 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2006-05-03 07:25:16 0000 -------
hppa stable.

------- Comment #11 From Matti Bickel 2006-05-26 02:35:06 0000 -------
Marked stable by hansmi, thanks!

------- Comment #12 From DEMAINE Benoît-Pierre, aka DoubleHP 2006-06-09 04:55:55 0000 -------
stable on Alpha (see bug #136172 )

------- Comment #13 From Csaba Tóth 2006-07-06 10:47:35 0000 -------
Pls look at #132972 bug. I use ~amd64 now with the most newest packages, and it
apperas there.

------- Comment #14 From Michael Weyershäuser 2006-08-19 15:29:47 0000 -------
Taking this off our conscience since Kugelfang marked it stable on amd64 a
while ago...

------- Comment #15 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-08-30 01:28:33 0000 -------
alpha done, arm/s390 don't have this even keyworded. Sending to ia64 folks.

------- Comment #16 From Eric Edgar (RETIRED) 2006-09-07 09:43:10 0000 -------
2.02.06 is stable .. this is no longer needed...

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug