First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 126619
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Accessibility Team <accessibility@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: David Fannin <dfannin@sushisoft.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
sphinx2-0.6.ebuild sphinx2-0.6 ebuild configuration text/plain David Fannin 2006-03-17 19:53 0000 683 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 126619 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 126619 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-03-17 19:52 0000
I needed sphinx-0.6 for a project, and portage only goes to 0.4.  I built a new
ebuild for 0.6, and it compiled beautifully.   I am doing further testing to
make sure everything works ok.   BTW - the gcc-3.4 patches needed for the 0.4
version are not needed for 0.6.

------- Comment #1 From David Fannin 2006-03-17 19:53:18 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=82425) [edit]
sphinx2-0.6 ebuild configuration

------- Comment #2 From David Fannin 2006-03-19 15:17:18 0000 -------
tested the ebuild by running the sphinx2-test script, as well as recording my
own speech file.   Both scripts worked without a problem.  My test speech file
was a recorded speech file with the words "one two three four", running through
the turtle vocabulary. 

------- Comment #3 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2006-06-18 22:03:11 0000 -------
Hey David, a few comments about your package:
1) When submitting new ebuilds, we request that you leave the header
information in-tact. Please read this document for more information:
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html
2) When it's just revision bumps similar to this one, it's not necessary to
repost the ebuild. I see you removed the epatch line, which means that "inherit
eutils" is no longer needed. Mentioning that the gcc patch is no longer needed
is sufficient, but I do thank you for pointing out that there was something
that needed changing.

Since removal of the "epatch" line is hardly something copyrightable and it is
abundandtly evident that the attached ebuild was modified from the original
script already copyrighted by the Gentoo Foundation, the header information has
been re-added and the version bump has been added to portage. Please remember
to add the header information next time, though. Thanks for the version bump!

------- Comment #4 From David Fannin 2006-06-18 22:22:01 0000 -------
Jon,

thanks for the pointers.  This was my first ebuild mod, so I appreciate the
coaching.  I have contributed a couple of other ebuilds, and have been using
the guide since then.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug