First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 126552
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Mobile Herd <mobile@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Chris Pritchard <brainiacghost@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 126552 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 126552 blocks: 120521
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-03-17 09:27 0000
can you please mark net-wireless/rt2500-1.10_beta3 stable, there havn't been
any bug reports and it would be very good, because if it is stable then it can 
go on the livecd

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc 2006-03-17 09:39:32 0000 -------
*** Bug 126555 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #2 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-03-17 10:45:45 0000 -------
Stable on x86... Here's a quick blurb from IRC where we were discussing this. 
If someone has a problem with this line of reasoning, please contact me
directly and we can work on a better solution for the future, but I don't think
that our users should suffer simply because nobody from the x86 team owns the
hardware to test this themselves.

<wolf31o2-work> ok... here's my take on it... as I told genstef at FOSDEM
<wolf31o2-work> there's no current stable version, which means it is *very*
unlikely that it will break any stable systems... it's been in ~arch for quite
some time now without complaint... since it is a kernel module, it interacts
fine with lots of kernels... so I would say that as long as there is at least 1
user to test, which has been done, and the package doesn't break anything
*else* instable, to go ahead and stabilize it
<wolf31o2-work> like I said... that's my take... things still need the 30+ days
in ~arch, but being a driver, it is very unlikely to take out anything else
<wolf31o2-work> and it is better than the current situation of having no driver
available for stable users
<tsunam> wolf31o2-work: I've had a driver, take out the kernel ;)
<wolf31o2-work> tsunam: yes, and it would probably happen within the first 30
days, too
<tsunam> lol
<wolf31o2-work> which is my point
<wolf31o2-work> if it survived ~arch and all the various kernels that people
use, then it should be pretty safe

I've also added ppc and amd64 to the bug.  I leave it up to them to decide if
they like my reasoning or not and keyword for themselves.

------- Comment #3 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-03-17 11:54:00 0000 -------
I guess I shouldn't have added x86 to this bug.

------- Comment #4 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2006-04-08 04:14:23 0000 -------
can't do more than compiling it, but that works. amd64 is happy

------- Comment #5 From Tobias Scherbaum 2006-04-08 06:30:06 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> can't do more than compiling it, but that works. amd64 is happy
+1, pcc stable.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug