First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 125996
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: UPSTREAM
Assigned To: Commonbox Team <commonbox@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Bret Towe <magnade@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
fluxbox-0.9.14-gcc41.patch fluxbox-0.9.14-gcc41.patch patch Bret Towe 2006-03-12 16:27 0000 4.28 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 125996 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 125996 blocks: 117482 139876
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-03-12 16:26 0000 
fluxbox fails with gcc 4.1 attached will be a patch to allow compiling
next version of fluxbox wont need this tho

------- Comment #1 From Bret Towe 2006-03-12 16:27:21 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=82004) [edit]
fluxbox-0.9.14-gcc41.patch

patch to allow compiling under gcc 4.1

------- Comment #2 From Ciaran McCreesh 2006-03-13 00:59:08 0000 ------- 
Did this get sent upstream already?

------- Comment #3 From Bret Towe 2006-03-13 12:24:22 0000 ------- 
no upstream already had fixes this is in part taken from svn
svn and .9.14 deverge a fair amount from what little i saw
when creating this patch

------- Comment #4 From Ciaran McCreesh 2006-03-13 12:42:09 0000 ------- 
Ok, we'll let upstream handle this.

------- Comment #5 From Bret Towe 2006-03-13 13:16:13 0000 ------- 
thats all fine and dandy if they intend to release a new version soon
but what about ppl using gcc 4.1 and such now?

------- Comment #6 From Ciaran McCreesh 2006-03-13 13:24:15 0000 ------- 
4.1's in package.mask, right?

------- Comment #7 From Bret Towe 2006-03-13 13:47:43 0000 ------- 
yes it is i dont see why that matters
as its still in portage masked or not

------- Comment #8 From Ciaran McCreesh 2006-03-13 13:52:45 0000 ------- 
Eh, it's hard masked, so you're not supposed to be using it. If you must use
hard masked gcc versions, grab one of the fluxbox-svn ebuilds that're floating
around. Otherwise, it's a fairly safe bet that there'll be a new fluxbox out
long before 4.1+ gets unmasked.

------- Comment #9 From Mark Loeser 2006-03-13 14:42:08 0000 ------- 
Please apply the patch.  4.1 will be coming out of p.mask in the next week or
so.  Just because it is hard masked is also not a good reason to not apply a
patch, especially when someone gives it to you.

------- Comment #10 From Ciaran McCreesh 2006-03-13 14:48:17 0000 ------- 
Better to persuade upstream to stick out a new release...

------- Comment #11 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-03-17 09:32:34 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 126547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #12 From Mark Loeser 2006-03-17 16:53:33 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 126592 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #13 From Ciaran McCreesh 2006-03-18 16:13:19 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 126728 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #14 From Ciaran McCreesh 2006-03-19 15:12:24 0000 ------- 
0.9.15 is in the tree and should work. If it doesn't, I'll cry.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug