First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 124788
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Tom Martin (RETIRED) <slarti@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Alexander Stoll <as@ha-networks.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 124788 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 124788 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-03-03 06:03 0000 
Please mark stable on x86, this bugfix version runs now for months without any
problem...
Best regards

------- Comment #1 From Joshua Jackson 2006-03-13 09:35:11 0000 ------- 
Slarti: what do you say about this?

------- Comment #2 From Tom Martin (RETIRED) 2006-03-23 09:49:30 0000 ------- 
x86 arch team: ping

I don't have an x86 on which to test.

------- Comment #3 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-03-23 11:04:42 0000 ------- 
This was the first reponse from you, which is why we hadn't done anything.

By the way, if you've got an amd64, you can test x86 (except kernel modules) by
simply using a chroot.

------- Comment #4 From Tom Martin (RETIRED) 2006-03-26 08:22:58 0000 ------- 
I couldn't test this properly in a 32 bit chroot -- it needs to be fed a fair
amount of mail through postfix to be tested properly, and I don't have a 32 bit
chroot set up at present anyway.

Also, the reason I was pinging you all earlier is that I've already been asked
twice on IRC by tsunam (who is on x86@, I guess?) if it was okay to stabilise
on x86, and I've said yes both times.

Sorry if this has got on someone's nerves.

------- Comment #5 From Joshua Jackson 2006-04-08 14:56:34 0000 ------- 
x86 marked stable (^.^)
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug