First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 124487
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: RiverRat <gentoo.riverrat@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
daemontools-64bit-clean.patch Adjustments. :) patch RiverRat 2006-02-28 22:21 0000 1.68 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 124487 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 124487 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-02-28 22:20 0000 
Small compile warnings that the compiler is complaining about but shouldn't be
that serious.  None the less:

chkshsgr.c:10: warning: passing arg 2 of `getgroups' from incompatible pointer
type                                                  
supervise.c:102: warning: passing arg 2 of `execve' from incompatible pointer
type                                                   
svscan.c:104: warning: passing arg 3 of `pathexec_run' from incompatible
pointer type                                                   
svscan.c:123: warning: passing arg 3 of `pathexec_run' from incompatible
pointer type                                                   
multilog.c:200: warning: passing arg 2 of `execve' from incompatible pointer
type

------- Comment #1 From RiverRat 2006-02-28 22:21:21 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=81010) [edit]
Adjustments.  :)

------- Comment #2 From SpanKY 2006-03-01 19:57:45 0000 ------- 
the warnings about incompatible pointers is not 64bit specific, nor is it a
serious warning ...

ive added a patch which includes a lot more headers, but i left the execve()
calls alone ...
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug