First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 123972
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 123972 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 123972 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-02-24 12:01 0000 
I'd like to clean up qemu with all the ancient cruft

mark both qemu-user and qemu-softmmu with the qemu metabuild or just what
works.

------- Comment #1 From Santiago Gala 2006-02-28 08:29:09 0000 ------- 
I got this error compiling 0.80 here:

inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm'

in this line:

    __asm__ __volatile__ ("stwbrx %1,0,%2" : "=m" (*(uint32_t *)ptr) : "r" (v),
"r" (ptr));

0.7.2 is building right here.

Any clue?

------- Comment #2 From Luca Barbato 2006-02-28 08:40:56 0000 ------- 
this night hopefully I'll check the issue, seems different issues are related
to different gcc versions...

------- Comment #3 From Chris White (RETIRED) 2006-03-10 17:44:07 0000 ------- 
lu_zero:

Wow, that's one heck of a night there ;p.  Anyways, any word on the bug or do
we need to sit back and hang tight while you deal with more stuff?

------- Comment #4 From Luca Barbato 2006-03-11 04:01:08 0000 ------- 
I tried to come up with something but got no positive results...

I'll check a cvs snapshot since got requested already

------- Comment #5 From Mark Loeser 2006-03-28 22:48:41 0000 ------- 
So...what's going on with this? :)  Should we just wait until you have another
version for us to mark?

------- Comment #6 From Luca Barbato 2006-03-28 22:54:11 0000 ------- 
if you can come up with a patch for your arch in order to mark it x86, I'm fine

------- Comment #7 From Chris White (RETIRED) 2006-03-29 00:08:48 0000 ------- 
x86 stable. I didn't get the supposed compiler error at all.

<cpw> ok now then
* cpw gets out the spiritual beads
<cpw> plzdunbreakthxbye
<cpw> alright, that should do it

------- Comment #8 From Philippe Trottier (RETIRED) 2006-04-18 03:53:21 0000 ------- 
I got qemu 0.8.0 working for a while using amd64. I am using it nearly everyday
at work with windows XP and 2000 as guests.

------- Comment #9 From Daniel Gryniewicz 2006-04-19 12:54:49 0000 ------- 
amd64 done.  Sorry for the delay.

------- Comment #10 From Christian Faulhammer 2006-08-06 09:06:56 0000 ------- 
I close this, all arches have stabilised...please beat me if I am wrong.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug