First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 123920
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo TreeCleaner Project <treecleaner@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 123920 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 123920 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-02-24 06:23 0000 
QA checks for package directory app-admin/flexlm:
app-admin/flexlm: digest collisions:
  major:  Digest conflict on 'enduser.pdf' in
'app-admin/flexlm/files/digest-flexlm-9.5-r1' (original was
'app-admin/flexlm/files/digest-flexlm-9.2.1')

Looks like two different versions use different files named enduser.pdf.

------- Comment #1 From Chris Bainbridge (RETIRED) 2006-02-24 12:17:05 0000 ------- 
Done (removed old ebuild).

------- Comment #2 From Jakub Moc 2007-11-29 21:37:55 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 200749 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #3 From Jakub Moc 2007-11-29 21:40:50 0000 ------- 
Eh, you can't have identical filenames for different tarballs and different
arches. Either mirror this manually or fetch-restrict this and instruct users
to download the thing and rename it to a unique filename - this can't be even
digested as it is.

------- Comment #4 From Mark Loeser 2008-01-10 03:16:01 0000 ------- 
Does anyone actually care to fix this?  If not, lets boot it.

treecleaner?

------- Comment #5 From Jakub Moc 2008-01-11 19:44:38 0000 ------- 
Please vote; dead stuff, last release 3+ years ago, nothing depends on this.

+1

------- Comment #6 From Łukasz Michalik 2008-01-13 20:41:23 0000 ------- 
Well, for some people there's just no alternative.  And having it in ebuild is
better than letting proprietary installer puke all over the place, even if the
ebuild itself isn't smartest thing either and have to be tricked/hacked.

-1

------- Comment #7 From Ryan Hill 2008-01-19 04:31:21 0000 ------- 
i'll take care of this one.

------- Comment #8 From Ryan Hill 2008-02-05 01:10:11 0000 ------- 
Fixed.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug