there are no known problems since january 2006. it's a maintenance releases. during stabilization don't forget, that bind-tools' version should be in sync with bind's one.
I'm just curious, why are we marking both of them instead of just the latest? That is what users are going to end up getting anyway.
sparc stable. answer: because on dns-land some people are picky about bind versions and choose to stay on the same branch.
stable on ppc64
stabilized on amd64.
Stable on x86. Please move this file to the mirrors though... (22K) net-dns/bind/files/dyndns-samples.tbz2
Marked 9.2.6 stable on ppc, hansmi already marked 9.3.2 stable on ppc.
9.2.6, 9.3.2 marked stable (bind, bind-tools)
All stable on hppa since Feb 18, it seems. tx, maybe, vapier. ;)
reassigning to alpha, the only arch left.
bind-9.2.6, bind-9.3.2, bind-tools-9.2.6, and bind-tools-9.3.2 stable on alpha. all tests passed.