First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 122248
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo LiveCD Package Maintainers <livecd@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
hwsetup-1.1-hwdata-knoppix.patch hwsetup-1.1-hwdata-knoppix.patch patch Jeroen Roovers 2006-02-09 06:44 0000 530 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 122248 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 122248 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-02-09 06:42 0000 
According to the CVS log messages, sys-apps/hwdata-gentoo "performs the same
task", so perhaps hwsetup's ebuild shouldn't RDEPEND on it.
sys-apps/portage-2.1_pre4-r1 gives me the following error:

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating world dependencies /
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "sys-apps/hwdata-knoppix".
(dependency required by "sys-apps/hwsetup-1.1" [ebuild])


!!! Problem resolving dependencies for x11-misc/mkxf86config
!!! Depgraph creation failed.

------- Comment #1 From Jeroen Roovers 2006-02-09 06:44:39 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=79318) [edit]
hwsetup-1.1-hwdata-knoppix.patch

------- Comment #2 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-02-09 07:11:45 0000 ------- 
This was already fixed in the tree.

------- Comment #3 From Jeroen Roovers 2006-02-09 09:17:38 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #2)
> This was already fixed in the tree.

No, it's not fixed at all. RDEPEND still refers to a non-existent package
sys-apps/hwdata-knoppix.

------- Comment #4 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-02-09 11:38:48 0000 ------- 
You're right... it was libkudzu I was thinking of...

Also, perhaps next time you could try contacting me rather than adding QA... It
really is better to try to resovle this amongst ourselves rather than
immediately being a "taddle tale" and running off to QA.  I made a mistake.  It
is pretty easy to do.  What this shows me is that I probably don't want to go
out of my way to work with you in the future, because if you disagree or find
fault in what I might say or do, you're going to go running to "mommy".  Try to
be a bit more considerate next time and at least attempt to work with the
developer in question.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug