Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 120224
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Security <security@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Carsten Lohrke <carlo@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Flags: Requestee:
 
 
  ()

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 120224 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 120224 blocks:

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-01-24 14:50 0000
The following freshmeat information:

A security issue in the SYSLOG interface (POSIX module) and an OPEN/:APPEND
regression have been fixed. SAVEINITMEM can create standalone executables. 

and the ChangeLog:

* POSIX:SYSLOG no longer recognizes "%m" and other formatting instructions.
  For your safety and security, please do all formatting in Lisp.

are unfortunately both not specific about the vulnerability.

------- Comment #1 From Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) 2006-01-24 14:59:12 0000 -------
please provide fixed ebuilds, thx

------- Comment #2 From Matthew Kennedy (RETIRED) 2006-01-25 13:51:17 0000 -------
I just committed a new ebuild for clisp-2.38. Will we be issuing a GLSA?  I
think the security issue at hand is an unsafe function in CLISP POSIX package,
so my feeling is it is not necessary...

------- Comment #3 From Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) 2006-01-25 14:01:58 0000 -------
ppc and x86, please mark stable.

Regarding a GLSA, I'm  not sure yet - I guess there will be a vote to decide
that after arches marked stable.

------- Comment #4 From Mark Loeser 2006-01-27 17:17:17 0000 -------
x86 done

------- Comment #5 From Tobias Scherbaum 2006-01-28 02:41:47 0000 -------
ppc stable

------- Comment #6 From Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) 2006-01-28 06:29:18 0000 -------
lets have a glsa vote. perl had something similar and we issued a glsa back
then. Though i'd say no, C also has unsafe formatted printing functions and
nobody would "fix" them...

------- Comment #7 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-02-06 12:26:46 0000 -------
I tend to vote YES.

------- Comment #8 From Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2006-02-07 10:19:18 0000 -------
I tend to vote no...

------- Comment #9 From Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2006-02-11 11:37:50 0000 -------
This is not really a security issue. It's a security improvement, that removes
some POSIX compatibility functions that would be unsafe if improperly used.

Correcting to full NO and closing, feel free to reopen if you disagree.

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug