First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 119245
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Nathan Blomquist <fleshy_ai@hotmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
mdadm-2.2-update-segv.patch mdadm-2.2-update-segv.patch patch SpanKY 2006-01-16 17:32 0000 477 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 119245 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 119245 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-01-16 16:55 0000 
I just recently upgraded from mdadm-2.1 to mdadm-2.2.

$server: mdadm -As /dev/md/0
segmentation fault

I found this when I rebooted me server to update my kernel. I was able to
re-start my raid array via:

$server: mdadm -A /dev/md/0 /dev/hde1 /dev/hdg1
... 2 drives started ...

The problem is (I believe) with the scan option.  The init.d/mdadm uses the
scan option and fails to activate the array.

Here is a discussion on this topic:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-raid@vger.kernel.org/msg03242.html

Reverting to mdadm 2.1 fixed the problem.

------- Comment #1 From SpanKY 2006-01-16 17:32:24 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=77308) [edit]
mdadm-2.2-update-segv.patch

try this patch and see if it fixes things for you

------- Comment #2 From Nathan Blomquist 2006-01-16 18:10:05 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=77308) [edit]
> mdadm-2.2-update-segv.patch
> 
> try this patch and see if it fixes things for you
> 

Sorry, I am relatively new to Gentoo and the portage system.  How would I apply
this and make portage not replace it?

------- Comment #3 From SpanKY 2006-01-16 18:20:00 0000 ------- 
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/bugzilla-howto.xml#doc_chap8 should cover it

------- Comment #4 From Nathan Blomquist 2006-01-16 18:57:42 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #3)
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/bugzilla-howto.xml#doc_chap8 should cover it
> 

Thanks for your help.  That patch and the howto doc helped out great. 
mdadm-2.2 built with the patch and I was able to execute an assemble/scan with
it.  The array started and seems to be functioning fine.

------- Comment #5 From SpanKY 2006-01-16 19:40:28 0000 ------- 
added to cvs then as 2.2-r1, thanks for testing
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug