First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 116760
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Simon Stelling (RETIRED) <blubb@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Simon Stelling (RETIRED) <blubb@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 116760 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 116760 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2005-12-26 01:15 0000 
*gparted-0.0.9 (26 Nov 2005)

  26 Nov 2005; Simon Stelling <blubb@gentoo.org> +gparted-0.0.9.ebuild:
  version bump

It's been in testing for 30 days now, no open bugs, so it is already stable on
amd64.

------- Comment #1 From Mark Loeser 2005-12-26 18:03:50 0000 ------- 
x86 done
hfsutils and gparted marked stable.

------- Comment #2 From Joe Jezak 2006-01-07 23:10:36 0000 ------- 
Should we wait until 0.0.9-r1 can be marked stable because of bug #116598
instead?  Or do you still want 0.0.9 marked stable?

------- Comment #3 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2006-01-08 02:39:14 0000 ------- 
the only change from 0.0.9 to 0.0.9-r1 is

-               xfs? ( sys-fs/xfsprogs )"
+               xfs? ( sys-fs/xfsprogs sys-fs/xfsdump )"

I don't really care which you stablize, but tbh I don't think it's really worth
waiting another 14 days just because of an added dep. So you can either break
the holy policy or stablize 0.0.9 ;) The only reason I asked to stablize -r0
was that I didn't want people shouting at me because I wanted an ebuild stable
that was only a few days old.

------- Comment #4 From Joe Jezak 2006-01-21 11:18:02 0000 ------- 
Marked ppc stable and we're the last arch, so closing the bug.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug