Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 116760 - please stablize sys-block/gparted-0.0.9
Summary: please stablize sys-block/gparted-0.0.9
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Simon Stelling (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-12-26 01:15 UTC by Simon Stelling (RETIRED)
Modified: 2006-01-21 11:18 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Simon Stelling (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-26 01:15:28 UTC 
*gparted-0.0.9 (26 Nov 2005)

  26 Nov 2005; Simon Stelling <blubb@gentoo.org> +gparted-0.0.9.ebuild:
  version bump

It's been in testing for 30 days now, no open bugs, so it is already stable on amd64.
Comment 1 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-26 18:03:50 UTC 
x86 done
hfsutils and gparted marked stable.
Comment 2 Joe Jezak (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-07 23:10:36 UTC 
Should we wait until 0.0.9-r1 can be marked stable because of bug #116598 instead?  Or do you still want 0.0.9 marked stable?
Comment 3 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-08 02:39:14 UTC 
the only change from 0.0.9 to 0.0.9-r1 is

-               xfs? ( sys-fs/xfsprogs )"
+               xfs? ( sys-fs/xfsprogs sys-fs/xfsdump )"

I don't really care which you stablize, but tbh I don't think it's really worth waiting another 14 days just because of an added dep. So you can either break the holy policy or stablize 0.0.9 ;) The only reason I asked to stablize -r0 was that I didn't want people shouting at me because I wanted an ebuild stable that was only a few days old.
Comment 4 Joe Jezak (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-21 11:18:02 UTC 
Marked ppc stable and we're the last arch, so closing the bug.