First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 11633
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: synonymousca@yahoo.com
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 11633 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 11633 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2002-12-05 10:41 0000
I've been looking around for bad dependencies on my system and see that the
most
recent versions of gob make it one of only two or three apps which explicitly
depend on glib-2.0*, rather than >=glib-2.0.0

It compiles fine with glib-2.1 (which is not in portage), and the most recent
ebuild should likely be changed to reflect this.


Furthermore, gob-1.99 and up have been masked since July with a note stating
that the dependencies on 1.x needed to be corrected. Only gnome-pilot and
evolution depend on 1.x (both with >=), and both compile fine with 2.0... 
Given
this result, later versions of gob need not install into a seperate slot.

Thus, I believe that gob can also be safely unmasked. 

(Note, however, that I tested evolution-1.2 and not 1.0.8)

For future reference, should similar reports be under component 'Ebuilds', or
is
this fine?

------- Comment #1 From foser (RETIRED) 2002-12-09 12:27:16 0000 -------
this is fine, it is a bug in the current tree not an enhancement... i will look
at it soon

------- Comment #2 From foser (RETIRED) 2002-12-11 11:47:54 0000 -------
Are you sure you just didnt have both around (i really think you had) ?

Anyway, i fixed the gnome-pilot and evolution deps and removed gob2 from
package.mask .

Thanks for your report

------- Comment #3 From synonymousca@yahoo.com 2002-12-11 19:29:36 0000 -------
Did I have both of what around? gob? I used a custom ebuilds which used the
same
slot when I was testing that stuff, so emerge clean should've gotten rid of all
traces of the older version.

Not that the SLOT stuff is that important, though.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug