Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 114655 - Second KMail 3.5.0-r1 IMAP filtering crash, patch in KDE SVN
Summary: Second KMail 3.5.0-r1 IMAP filtering crash, patch in KDE SVN
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] KDE (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High critical (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo KDE team
URL: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-12-06 13:42 UTC by Craig Bradney
Modified: 2005-12-07 16:18 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Craig Bradney 2005-12-06 13:42:18 UTC
After http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114118 was resolved there was  
still a crash. There is another patch in KDE SVN which is also shown at:  
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113730. This is a request for that patch 
to go into portage too, please. 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Filter using spamassassin and kmail 3.5.0 with IMAP  
2.    
3.   
   
Actual Results:  
Crash
Comment 1 Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-07 07:23:45 UTC
Committed. 
Comment 2 Craig Bradney 2005-12-07 13:54:41 UTC
Thanks.. and guess what, theres a final patch but maybe you knew that from the    
kde packager list.    
http://websvn.kde.org/branches/KDE/3.5/kdepim/kmail/?sortby=date#dirlist    
Shows:    
(file) actionscheduler.cpp        486422   115 minutes   gungl   completion of    
the fix for bug 113730    
(file) actionscheduler.h        486422   115 minutes   gungl   completion of    
the fix for bug 113730    
(file) kmfilteraction.cpp        486422   115 minutes   gungl   completion of    
the fix for bug 113730    
    
the way the code is now with the r2, running the filter will stop after the  
first message. I'll reopen this I guess.  
Comment 3 Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-07 16:05:20 UTC
Oh well, here comes another revision...  
Comment 4 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-07 16:10:33 UTC
Hope we won't reach -r99.. 
 
Comment 5 Craig Bradney 2005-12-07 16:18:47 UTC
Yeah me too, though I think we have hit the end with this bug here.  Andreas 
Gungl did a good job, but I don't think he will want to revisit the code soon. 
Thanks for the help guys.