Bugzilla Bug 114429

I'm working on it.

*** Bug 114433 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Sorry for the dupe Carlo. Is koffice unaffected by this one? 

And another round...

<<< kpdf-3.4.3-r1.ebuild
<<< kdegraphics-3.4.3-r1.ebuild

<<< kword-1.4.2-r2.ebuild
<<< koffice-1.4.2-r2.ebuild  (yes r2, not r3)


If some archs really can't do the now forced upgrade to KDE 3.4.3, please drop a
line and I'll have a look at KDE 3.4.1.

kpdf-3.4.3-r1,  kword-1.4.2-r2,  koffice-1.4.2-r2 stable on ppc64 

Stable on ppc, none of the packages is in (~)hppa.

(In reply to comment #5)
> Stable on ppc, none of the packages is in (~)hppa.

koffice and kdegraphics are, the split packages aren't.

Stable on amd64. 

x86 needs this backported to 3.4.1 as we don't have 3.4.3 stable yet.  cpw is
still trying to work out the remaining issues before we mark KDE-3.4.3 stable.

(In reply to comment #8)
> x86 needs this backported to 3.4.1 as we don't have 3.4.3 stable yet.

The existing patches apply and should work, didn't tested though. Same for bug
114583.

>  cpw is
> still trying to work out the remaining issues before we mark KDE-3.4.3 stable.

What Issues? There were no really problematic regression bugs against 3.4.3 iirc
and it ran fine here for two months. x86 is really the least arch I expected
problems with.

(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > x86 needs this backported to 3.4.1 as we don't have 3.4.3 stable yet.
> 
> The existing patches apply and should work, didn't tested though. Same for bug
> 114583.

Okay, could you make those ebuilds so I can mark them?

> >  cpw is
> > still trying to work out the remaining issues before we mark KDE-3.4.3 stable.
> 
> What Issues? There were no really problematic regression bugs against 3.4.3 iirc
> and it ran fine here for two months. x86 is really the least arch I expected
> problems with.

You can look on the KDE 3.4.3 stablization, bug #112842.  Patches have been
getting added to fix the issues he found, but I'm not rushing 3.4.3 to be
stablized just to fix these security issues.  Its two separate problems.

> Okay, could you make those ebuilds so I can mark them?

Already in cvs.

Upstream patches are not complete. Back to upstream status for now. 

I'm sorry that some of you have to do the work twice, but don't blame me
please...

<<< kword-1.4.2-r4.ebuild
<<< koffice-1.4.2-r4.ebuild

<<< kpdf-3.4.1-r3.ebuild
<<< kpdf-3.4.3-r2.ebuild
<<< kdegraphics-3.4.1-r3.ebuild
<<< kdegraphics-3.4.3-r2.ebuild

You deleted the ppc stable version of kdegraphics-3.4.3, which broke the tree. 
:p  Please don't do that in the future.  I've marked kdegraphics-3.4.3-r2 stable
to fix this.

Halyc0n got koffice stuff, I got kdegraphics stuff.

(In reply to comment #14)
> You deleted the ppc stable version of kdegraphics-3.4.3, which broke the tree. 
> :p  Please don't do that in the future.  I've marked kdegraphics-3.4.3-r2 stable
> to fix this.

Ditto for amd64 - I'm getting a forced downgrade back to kword-1.4.2 and
kpdf-3.4.3.  The previous stable version may still have had issues, but the
older version obviously isn't any better, and there isn't any sense in making
everybody downgrade only to have them upgrade a few days later when the latest
version does get marked stable.  Please refrain from deleting the latest stable
package.

Stable on amd64 again. 

stable on ppc64 

Stable on SPARC

still missing:

kword-1.4.2-r4: alpha ppc
koffice-1.4.2-r4: alpha ppc
kpdf-3.4.3-r2 (or 3.4.1-r3): alpha ppc
kdegraphics-3.4.3-r2 (or 3.4.1-r3): hppa ia64 mips ppc64?

kde-3.4.x was newer marked ppc64 - only kde-meta-3.4.x. (yea, I'm lazy...) 

ppc and hppa done

(In reply to comment #20)
> still missing:
> 
> kword-1.4.2-r4: alpha ppc
> koffice-1.4.2-r4: alpha ppc
> kpdf-3.4.3-r2 (or 3.4.1-r3): alpha ppc

I'm already working on alpha keywording since several days ago, but koffice is a
little beast and takes lot of time to compile on our alpha cluster. 

Hope to have it finished ASAP, but also bug #112840 (about marking 1.4.2 stable)
seems to be needed before closing this. 

BTW, Carlo are the koffice tests working on any arch? On Alpha failed.

(In reply to comment #23)
> BTW, Carlo are the koffice tests working on any arch? On Alpha failed.
> 

The KDE herd simply ignores them, but we're fond of guys with patches, though.
:) But hold your breath, it looks like this is a neverending story and we'll see
another round of patches. :(

alpha, mips please test and mark stable. Don't hold your breath for the second 
round of stable marking, please. 

kword-1.4.2-r4, koffice-1.4.2-r4 and kpdf-3.4.3-r2 are now marked stable on
alpha.

I'm sorry guys about the delay on this, but trust me if i tell you it has been
a hell to keyword these packages during this week. :(

(In reply to comment #24)
> The KDE herd simply ignores them, but we're fond of guys with patches, though.
> :) But hold your breath, it looks like this is a neverending story and we'll see another round of patches. :(

It would be much appreciated for us. Thanks.

Maybe better to wait for more. GLSA ready though and we issued one for
[x-g]pdf... so jaervosz's call

Fixing all kpdf issues on bug #115851-> Closing.