Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 114060 - Please mark sys-apps/module-init-tools-3.2.1 stable on x86
Summary: Please mark sys-apps/module-init-tools-3.2.1 stable on x86
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Developers for the x86 Architecture
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-11-30 10:58 UTC by Henrik Brix Andersen
Modified: 2005-12-28 21:35 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Henrik Brix Andersen 2005-11-30 10:58:20 UTC
Background information: the IOCTLs used by sys-apps/pcmcia-cs are deprecated and
pending removal from the linux kernel. The replacement for pcmcia-cs is
sys-apps/pcmciautils. This package requires
>=sys-apps/module-init-tools-3.2_pre4, which is currently marked ~x86.

In order to be able to provide a smooth transition from pcmcia-cs to pcmciautils
it is crucial that we get pcmciautils marked stable on at least x86 before the
pcmcia-cs IOCTLs are finally removed from the kernel.

The first step is to get the module-init-tools dependency fulfilled.
Comment 1 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-06 22:52:44 UTC
base-system: any known issues with this version to keep it from going stable?
Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-12-07 05:46:25 UTC
other than it's a _pre package, no
Comment 3 Henrik Brix Andersen 2005-12-07 05:53:20 UTC
An alternative would be to mark module-init-tools-3.2.1 stable...
Comment 4 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-08 23:44:59 UTC
That package was just added the other day.  I'd personally rather wait to make
sure its stable before we take any action on this.
Comment 5 Henrik Brix Andersen 2005-12-09 00:55:10 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> That package was just added the other day.  I'd personally rather wait to make
> sure its stable before we take any action on this.

I agree - which is why this bug report is about module-init-tools-3.2_pre7-r1. I
was only listing 3.2.1 as an alternative.

Seeing that marking a pre-release stable might not fall in everyones taste, how
about we wait until 3.2.1 has been in Portage for ~30 days without any bug
reports (hopefully January 3rd?) and then mark 3.2.1 stable on x86?
Comment 6 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-09 01:04:14 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Seeing that marking a pre-release stable might not fall in everyones taste, how
> about we wait until 3.2.1 has been in Portage for ~30 days without any bug
> reports (hopefully January 3rd?) and then mark 3.2.1 stable on x86?

This sounds best to me.  Prod us around then and we'll fix it.
Comment 7 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-12-28 12:38:27 UTC
3.2.1 should be ready to go stable now, kthxbye
Comment 8 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-28 21:35:06 UTC
Stable on x86, thanks