First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 113818
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Project Gentopia <gentopia@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) <compnerd@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 113818 depends on: 113826 114669 116864 Show dependency tree
Bug 113818 blocks: 109235 119634
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-11-28 10:40 0000
This has been in portage for quite some time as unstable.  It also is required
to fix another issue.  Requesting to move to stable.

------- Comment #1 From Luis Medinas (RETIRED) 2005-11-28 11:32:40 0000 -------
stable on amd64

------- Comment #2 From Luis Medinas (RETIRED) 2005-11-28 11:41:52 0000 -------
re-adding amd64 until dbus 0.36.2 will be requested for stable

------- Comment #3 From John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) 2005-11-28 11:45:00 0000 -------
before marking stable, theres a lot of things to be tested:

1.  Upgrade / Downgrade cycles with things that are marked = for hal 4*.
2.  Will this break current GNOME / KDE stable installs(think automounting)? (
some api changed between 4 and 5, so a lot of packs are = 4* )

Just those 2 things require a bunch of testing :)

Please make sure all packages relying on hal are tested before marking stable.

Thanks

------- Comment #4 From Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) 2005-11-28 11:47:25 0000 -------
adding KDE and GNOME to CC as this affects both

------- Comment #5 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-11-29 05:12:24 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #3) 
> 2.  Will this break current GNOME / KDE stable installs(think automounting)?  
 
kdebase will definitely need to be recompiled after hal-0.5 is marked stable. 
Maybe the ebuild could give a message in pkg_postinst along the lines of the 
one in media-libs/flac? 
 
 

------- Comment #6 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2005-11-29 05:59:46 0000 -------
sparc never had hal stable, in fact other than the development profiles it's
masked.

------- Comment #7 From Carsten Lohrke 2005-11-29 08:40:46 0000 -------
A newer K3B version needs to go stable as well (I don't even know, if those
work
reliably with the currently unstable hal/dbus combination).

------- Comment #8 From Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) 2005-11-29 09:23:40 0000 -------
greg_g: Done.  Added an upgrade warning in pkg_postinst.
carlo: Could you make a bug and have it block this one please?

------- Comment #9 From Caleb Tennis 2005-12-05 06:00:21 0000 -------
KDE team: what does everyone think about using this hal and dbus on kde-3.5 and 
making a hard dep on the previous versions for kde-3.4?  This would help 
resolve this issue. 

------- Comment #10 From Marcus D. Hanwell 2005-12-05 11:55:13 0000 -------
This would also block Gnome 2.12 from going stable, which is the main reason I 
spent so long making sure KDE could work with either version. This should be 
considered, or may be we do a hard dep now, and then a rev bump when they move 
forward? 

------- Comment #11 From Carsten Lohrke 2005-12-06 15:52:18 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> KDE team: what does everyone think about using this hal and dbus on kde-3.5 and 
> making a hard dep on the previous versions for kde-3.4?  This would help 
> resolve this issue. 

Not that I care (since I don't use hal/dbus), but I wonder what it would help.
Those who use the currently stable hal/dbus combination have to rebuild anyways.
As with other dependencies, the "classic" (and mildly annoying) revdep-rebuild
run is necessary, as long as we don't have proper reverse dependency support
built into Portage. What I do more care about is, that the less broken
revdep-rebuild version is still in a marked testing gentoolkit ebuild, while the
currently stable one is hideous broken.

------- Comment #12 From Doug Goldstein 2005-12-21 00:31:53 0000 -------
0.5.5.1 is much needed improvement over 0.5.4

------- Comment #13 From Markus Rothe 2005-12-22 11:56:36 0000 -------
This is PPC64. I ran hal-0.5.5.1 quite some time and just updated to
hal-0.5.5.1-r1.

so where are we? still stable request? I haven't seen a solid statement from
KDE/Gnome herd if it can go stable.

------- Comment #14 From Markus Rothe 2005-12-23 14:21:16 0000 -------
PPC64 is not hitting the k3b problem as we don't have it marked ~ppc64 or even
stable.

Now that I have looked at the dependecies of hal-0.5.5.1-r1 I saw that it
requires >=sys-fs/udev-071. So which version is going to be stabilized? I am
currently running 072 and have no problems so far.

------- Comment #15 From Brian Beardall 2005-12-26 14:26:35 0000 -------
I ran into problem with hal-0.5.5.1 with udev-071 - udev-073.  Those versions
of udev weren't reporting usb hotplug events correctly.  This meant that USB
sticks weren't able to automount.  I've tested that udev-079 doesn't miss the
USB hotplug events and correctly reports such events to HAL.  This problem
occured on my two computers.

------- Comment #16 From Markus Rothe 2005-12-27 02:37:49 0000 -------
can you please verify this behaviour with udev-072. I've also issues with 071
and 073, but 072 is just working fine here.

------- Comment #17 From Brian Beardall 2005-12-27 11:37:52 0000 -------
I went and tested udev-072 and it does catch the usb hotplug events correctly. 
udev-071, and udev-073 don't catch the usb hotplug events correctly.  udev-079
also catches the usb hotplug events correctly.

------- Comment #18 From Bryan Hundven 2005-12-27 22:26:59 0000 -------
It would seem that bug 116530 tells us that dbus doesn't know about
mdassembler.
This makes dbus not build successfuly with USE="doc mono".

------- Comment #19 From Steve Yin 2006-01-14 04:31:15 0000 -------
I have been running baselayout-1.11.14 and udev-079 and hal-0.5.5.1-r1,
dbus-0.60-r3, no problem, works fine with gnome-2.12.2

------- Comment #20 From Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) 2006-01-21 17:38:07 0000 -------
stable on x86

------- Comment #21 From Daniel Gryniewicz 2006-01-21 20:08:21 0000 -------
amd64 done.

------- Comment #22 From Tobias Scherbaum 2006-01-22 00:30:23 0000 -------
ppc stable

------- Comment #23 From Markus Rothe 2006-01-23 13:21:18 0000 -------
stable on ppc64

------- Comment #24 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-01-23 13:24:10 0000 -------
Removing bug #119737 since ia64 hadn't started the process of stabilizing gnome
and its dependencies for the release snapshot.

------- Comment #25 From Aron Griffis (RETIRED) 2006-02-17 14:01:29 0000 -------
ia64 done, which possibly means that this bug can be closed...

------- Comment #26 From Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) 2006-03-04 17:25:03 0000 -------
Adding alpha as it is the only remaining arch.

------- Comment #27 From Steev Klimaszewski 2006-04-26 22:51:10 0000 -------
alpha? any word?

------- Comment #28 From Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) 2006-05-19 00:56:32 0000 -------
alpha done by our very own kloeri. YEY.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug