Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 113818 - [STABLE REQUEST] sys-apps/hal-0.5.5.1-r3
Summary: [STABLE REQUEST] sys-apps/hal-0.5.5.1-r3
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Project Gentopia
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 113826 114669 116864
Blocks: 109235 119634
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2005-11-28 10:40 UTC by Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED)
Modified: 2006-05-19 00:56 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-28 10:40:31 UTC
This has been in portage for quite some time as unstable.  It also is required
to fix another issue.  Requesting to move to stable.
Comment 1 Luis Medinas (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-28 11:32:40 UTC
stable on amd64
Comment 2 Luis Medinas (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-28 11:41:52 UTC
re-adding amd64 until dbus 0.36.2 will be requested for stable
Comment 3 John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-28 11:45:00 UTC
before marking stable, theres a lot of things to be tested:

1.  Upgrade / Downgrade cycles with things that are marked = for hal 4*.
2.  Will this break current GNOME / KDE stable installs(think automounting)? (
some api changed between 4 and 5, so a lot of packs are = 4* )

Just those 2 things require a bunch of testing :)

Please make sure all packages relying on hal are tested before marking stable.

Thanks
Comment 4 Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-28 11:47:25 UTC
adding KDE and GNOME to CC as this affects both
Comment 5 Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-29 05:12:24 UTC
(In reply to comment #3) 
> 2.  Will this break current GNOME / KDE stable installs(think automounting)?  
 
kdebase will definitely need to be recompiled after hal-0.5 is marked stable. 
Maybe the ebuild could give a message in pkg_postinst along the lines of the 
one in media-libs/flac? 
 
 
Comment 6 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-29 05:59:46 UTC
sparc never had hal stable, in fact other than the development profiles it's masked.
Comment 7 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-29 08:40:46 UTC
A newer K3B version needs to go stable as well (I don't even know, if those work
reliably with the currently unstable hal/dbus combination).
Comment 8 Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-29 09:23:40 UTC
greg_g: Done.  Added an upgrade warning in pkg_postinst.
carlo: Could you make a bug and have it block this one please?
Comment 9 Caleb Tennis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-05 06:00:21 UTC
KDE team: what does everyone think about using this hal and dbus on kde-3.5 and 
making a hard dep on the previous versions for kde-3.4?  This would help 
resolve this issue. 
Comment 10 Marcus D. Hanwell (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-05 11:55:13 UTC
This would also block Gnome 2.12 from going stable, which is the main reason I 
spent so long making sure KDE could work with either version. This should be 
considered, or may be we do a hard dep now, and then a rev bump when they move 
forward? 
Comment 11 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-06 15:52:18 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
> KDE team: what does everyone think about using this hal and dbus on kde-3.5 and 
> making a hard dep on the previous versions for kde-3.4?  This would help 
> resolve this issue. 

Not that I care (since I don't use hal/dbus), but I wonder what it would help.
Those who use the currently stable hal/dbus combination have to rebuild anyways.
As with other dependencies, the "classic" (and mildly annoying) revdep-rebuild
run is necessary, as long as we don't have proper reverse dependency support
built into Portage. What I do more care about is, that the less broken
revdep-rebuild version is still in a marked testing gentoolkit ebuild, while the
currently stable one is hideous broken.
Comment 12 Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-21 00:31:53 UTC
0.5.5.1 is much needed improvement over 0.5.4
Comment 13 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-22 11:56:36 UTC
This is PPC64. I ran hal-0.5.5.1 quite some time and just updated to hal-0.5.5.1-r1.

so where are we? still stable request? I haven't seen a solid statement from KDE/Gnome herd if it can go stable.
Comment 14 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-23 14:21:16 UTC
PPC64 is not hitting the k3b problem as we don't have it marked ~ppc64 or even stable.

Now that I have looked at the dependecies of hal-0.5.5.1-r1 I saw that it requires >=sys-fs/udev-071. So which version is going to be stabilized? I am currently running 072 and have no problems so far.
Comment 15 Brian Beardall 2005-12-26 14:26:35 UTC
I ran into problem with hal-0.5.5.1 with udev-071 - udev-073.  Those versions of udev weren't reporting usb hotplug events correctly.  This meant that USB sticks weren't able to automount.  I've tested that udev-079 doesn't miss the USB hotplug events and correctly reports such events to HAL.  This problem occured on my two computers.
Comment 16 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-27 02:37:49 UTC
can you please verify this behaviour with udev-072. I've also issues with 071 and 073, but 072 is just working fine here.
Comment 17 Brian Beardall 2005-12-27 11:37:52 UTC
I went and tested udev-072 and it does catch the usb hotplug events correctly.  udev-071, and udev-073 don't catch the usb hotplug events correctly.  udev-079 also catches the usb hotplug events correctly.
Comment 18 Bryan Hundven 2005-12-27 22:26:59 UTC
It would seem that bug 116530 tells us that dbus doesn't know about mdassembler.
This makes dbus not build successfuly with USE="doc mono".
Comment 19 Steve Yin 2006-01-14 04:31:15 UTC
I have been running baselayout-1.11.14 and udev-079 and hal-0.5.5.1-r1, dbus-0.60-r3, no problem, works fine with gnome-2.12.2
Comment 20 Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-21 17:38:07 UTC
stable on x86
Comment 21 Daniel Gryniewicz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-21 20:08:21 UTC
amd64 done.
Comment 22 Tobias Scherbaum (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-22 00:30:23 UTC
ppc stable
Comment 23 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-23 13:21:18 UTC
stable on ppc64
Comment 24 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-23 13:24:10 UTC
Removing bug #119737 since ia64 hadn't started the process of stabilizing gnome and its dependencies for the release snapshot.
Comment 25 Aron Griffis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-17 14:01:29 UTC
ia64 done, which possibly means that this bug can be closed...
Comment 26 Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-04 17:25:03 UTC
Adding alpha as it is the only remaining arch.
Comment 27 Steev Klimaszewski (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-26 22:51:10 UTC
alpha? any word?
Comment 28 Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-19 00:56:32 UTC
alpha done by our very own kloeri. YEY.