First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 113128
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: AMD64 Project <amd64@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Olivier Hill <olivier.hill@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
patch-libspf2-1.2.5-amd64 files/patch-libspf2-1.2.5-amd64 patch Olivier Hill 2005-11-20 20:16 0000 316 bytes Details | Diff
libspf2-1.2.5-r2.ebuild libspf2-1.2.5-r2.ebuild text/plain Olivier Hill 2005-11-20 20:19 0000 1.27 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 113128 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 113128 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2005-11-20 20:14 0000 
As reported by Carsten Koch-Mauthe, libspf2-1.2.5 is not 64 bit safe.

This can cause Exim to segfault if it was configured to use spf.

You can see the complete report at:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/24280?do=post_view_threaded

The solution is to simply declare the buflen variable as size_t instead of int.

I have created a patch and will try to attach it to the bug report.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
emerge libspf
USE="spf" emerge exim

Start Exim and wait for some emails to come by.
Actual Results:  
Look at dmesg, you should see the following:
exim[11307]: segfault at 0000000000616000 rip 00002aaaabe25a73 rsp
00007fffffbffea8 error 6

------- Comment #1 From Olivier Hill 2005-11-20 20:16:11 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=73276) [edit]
Patch for 64 bit safety

------- Comment #2 From Olivier Hill 2005-11-20 20:19:44 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=73277) [edit]
libspf2-1.2.5-r2.ebuild

------- Comment #3 From Jakub Moc 2006-08-01 10:03:31 0000 ------- 
Sending this amd64 way, been sitting here for ages and it concerns mainly them,
after all.

------- Comment #4 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2006-09-27 04:56:22 0000 ------- 
thanks Olivier, patch is applied in -r2
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug