Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 112351 - stabilize net-firewall/iptables-1.3.4 for Linux 2.6.14
Summary: stabilize net-firewall/iptables-1.3.4 for Linux 2.6.14
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Developers for the x86 Architecture
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-11-12 16:41 UTC by Daniel Drake (RETIRED)
Modified: 2005-11-12 20:49 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
iptables-1.3.2-connbytes.patch (iptables-1.3.2-connbytes.patch,738 bytes, patch)
2005-11-12 16:42 UTC, Daniel Drake (RETIRED)
Details | Diff
iptables-1.3.2-string.patch (iptables-1.3.2-string.patch,7.58 KB, patch)
2005-11-12 16:42 UTC, Daniel Drake (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-12 16:41:44 UTC
1.3.2 (the current stable version) with USE=extensions doesn't compile against
2.6.14, here's two patches to fix this.

If acceptable, please commit these soon. 2.6.14 is stable and people want my
head. :)
Comment 1 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-12 16:42:29 UTC
Created attachment 72779 [details, diff]
iptables-1.3.2-connbytes.patch

This lovely hack is engineered by myself
Comment 2 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-12 16:42:50 UTC
Created attachment 72780 [details, diff]
iptables-1.3.2-string.patch

and this one came from iptables svn
Comment 3 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-11-12 17:09:21 UTC
i dont want to patch 1.3.2

if 1.3.4 works, then move that to stable
Comment 4 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-12 17:37:50 UTC
Ok - please do so (or file the appropriate bug or whatever). This should be done
ASAP since 2.6.14 is stable (which is why I thought patching 1.3.2 might be the
quicker approach).
Comment 5 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-12 20:49:40 UTC
This is stable on x86.  Shouldn't other archs be made aware of this as well?

Resolving it for now though, since 2.6.14 doesn't seem to be stable for them yet.