First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 111212
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Printing Team <printing@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Paolo Pedroni <paolo.pedroni@iol.it>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 111212 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 111212 blocks: 119737
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-11-02 00:25 0000
After one month of use I can say that it works on my AMD64 box. It totally 
fixed printing for me, I never managed to get the printer to work on that box 
before. 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
 



Portage 2.0.51.22-r3 (default-linux/amd64/2005.1, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r2, 
2.6.13-gentoo-r5 x86_64) 
================================================================= 
System uname: 2.6.13-gentoo-r5 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3800+ 
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.13 
ccache version 2.3 [enabled] 
dev-lang/python:     2.4.2 
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.12 
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r6 
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1 
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r10 
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.20 
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2 
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" 
AUTOCLEAN="yes" 
CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" 
CFLAGS="-march=k8 -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" 
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" 
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/env /usr/kde/3.4/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/share/config /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/ /usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/control" 
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d" 
CXXFLAGS="-march=k8 -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" 
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" 
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache collision-protect distlocks sandbox sfperms strict 
userpriv usersandbox" 
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.mirror.solnet.ch http://gentoo.inode.at/ 
http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/gentoo/ 
http://ftp.snt.utwente.nl/pub/os/linux/gentoo http://ftp.du.se/pub/os/gentoo" 
LC_ALL="it_IT.utf8" 
LINGUAS="it" 
MAKEOPTS="-j2" 
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" 
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" 
PORTDIR="/usr/portage" 
SYNC="rsync://rsync.europe.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" 
USE="amd64 X Xaw3d aalib acpi alsa arts avi bash-completion berkdb bitmap-fonts 
bzip2 bzlib caps cdparanoia cdr crypt cups curl dga dio divx4linux doc dvd 
dvdread eds emboss encode evo exif fam fbcon ffmpeg fftw flac foomaticdb 
fortran ftp gcj gd ggi gif gnutls gphoto2 gpm gstreamer gtk2 hal imagemagick 
java javascript joystick jpeg kde kdeenablefinal libcaca libwww lm_sensors lzw 
lzw-tiff mad maildir matroska mbox mng mozilla mp3 mpeg mpi ncurses nls nptl 
nsplugin offensive ogg oggvorbis openal opengl oss pam pdflib perl png posix 
ppds python qt quicktime readline sasl scanner sdl sockets sox speex spell ssl 
svg symlink sysvipc tcltk tcpd tetex theora threads tiff truetype 
truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode usb userlocales videos vorbis wmf xine 
xml2 xosd xpm xv xvid zlib linguas_it userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc" 
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LANG, LDFLAGS, PORTDIR_OVERLAY

------- Comment #1 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2005-11-21 11:40:45 0000 -------
printing herd: do you think the same? if so, we should probably CC x86 and ppc
too

------- Comment #2 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-01-14 14:49:04 0000 -------
it is not stable, because I do not have a stable system and do not care about.
Please mark packages in printing with >30days in ~ and no open bugs stable.

------- Comment #3 From Marcus D. Hanwell 2006-01-14 16:53:58 0000 -------
Marked stable on amd64, it has been working better than ghostscript for me on
amd64 too.

------- Comment #4 From Frank Groeneveld 2006-01-17 05:57:34 0000 -------
I've been using it for a couple of days now, and I have absolutely no problems
with it. I think it can be marked stable on x86.

------- Comment #5 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-01-20 12:59:40 0000 -------
ppc and x86, please go ahead ..

------- Comment #6 From Tobias Scherbaum 2006-01-20 22:49:47 0000 -------
ppc stable

------- Comment #7 From Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) 2006-01-21 11:23:12 0000 -------
stable on x86

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug