First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 110905
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Java team <java@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Josh Nichols (RETIRED) <nichoj@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 110905 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 110905 blocks: 69972
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2005-10-30 08:48 0000 
Following the new java policy, packages shouldn't rely on bundled jars.

------- Comment #1 From Mark 2005-11-08 12:30:04 0000 ------- 
is this package still supported?

------- Comment #2 From Josh Nichols (RETIRED) 2005-11-08 12:37:56 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #1)
> is this package still supported?

Considering that it is in portage, and not hard masked, I would say so.

------- Comment #3 From Petteri Räty 2006-12-27 15:12:25 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > is this package still supported?
> 
> Considering that it is in portage, and not hard masked, I would say so.

And it is dependent upon

01:11 <Betelgeuse> !rdep octopus
01:11 <jeeves> dev-db/octopus <- dev-db/c-jdbc

I am not sure if this bug was valid to begin with. Most likely the deps were
just pulled in via the ant launcher. There was a bunch of maven stuff in there
but don't know if it was used. Any way I checked that 3.0.1-r1 that uses
generation 2 does not use package jars any more so this can be marked as FIXED.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug