First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 110317
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) <satya@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Radek Podgorny <radek@podgorny.cz>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
unionfs-1.1.1-10-nfs.patch nfs lock patch patch Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) 2005-10-27 01:27 0000 944 bytes Details | Diff
unionfs-1.1.1.ebuild.patch unionfs 1.1.1 ebuild (patch vs 1.0.14) patch Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) 2005-10-27 01:30 0000 1014 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 110317 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 110317 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2005-10-24 06:05 0000 
The new release is linux-2.6 only and includes many important bugfixes...

------- Comment #1 From Stefan Schweizer 2005-10-24 07:49:23 0000 ------- 
Can you please post the unified diff (diff -u old.ebuild new.ebuild)?

------- Comment #2 From Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) 2005-10-27 00:40:54 0000 ------- 
1.1.1 resolves most large directories issues, save nfs locking (patch will
follow)

------- Comment #3 From Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) 2005-10-27 01:27:07 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=71549) [edit]
nfs lock patch

------- Comment #4 From Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) 2005-10-27 01:30:24 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=71550) [edit]
unionfs 1.1.1 ebuild (patch vs 1.0.14)

------- Comment #5 From Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) 2005-10-27 01:31:01 0000 ------- 
I couldn't test it on amd64. Anyone?

------- Comment #6 From Darrel Clute 2005-11-06 03:37:07 0000 ------- 
I can confirm that this patch works on AMD64 systems.

------- Comment #7 From Darrel Clute 2005-11-06 22:19:57 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #6)
> I can confirm that this patch works on AMD64 systems.

Meant to state that the ebuild resulting from the patch works on AMD64 systems.

------- Comment #8 From Stefan Schweizer 2005-12-24 16:30:37 0000 ------- 
I do not use unionfs currently. Satya, can you please bump it or should it be
moved to maintainer-needed?

------- Comment #9 From Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) 2005-12-25 02:16:11 0000 ------- 
Ok, I'm taking it.
I haven't access to my dev box at now: travelling until the 3rd week of
january, but maybe I'll be able to do something before (you'll still have to
wait the beginning of january, though).

------- Comment #10 From Eric Thibodeau 2006-01-27 15:27:09 0000 ------- 
Well...jsut thought I'd say I simply renamed unionfs-1.0.14.ebuild to
unionfs-1.1.2.ebuild, removed the epatch entries and everything built perfectly
well. The module seems to be working fine for the moment as I am using it for a
Gentoo SSI configuration
http://wiki.neuralbs.com/index.php/Gentoo_Diskless_Client without any problems
(arch is x86).

------- Comment #11 From Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) 2006-02-13 05:44:10 0000 ------- 
in portage: sorry for the delay.
Thanks to all testers!
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug