First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 107018
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo KDE team <kde@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Brian S. Stephan <bssteph@incorporeal.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
juk-3.5_beta1.ebuild Replacement juk-3.5_beta1 ebuild text/plain Brian S. Stephan 2005-09-23 10:48 0000 1.09 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 107018 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 107018 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2005-09-23 10:46 0000 
The juk ebuild for 3.5 alpha1/beta1 bombs out in a variety of fashions because  
it seemingly hasn't been updated for various KDE 3.5 changes.  

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Emerge a KDE 3.5 juk 
2. Watch it fail. :) 




The juk ebuild for 3.5 alpha1/beta1 bombs out in a variety of fashions because  
it seemingly hasn't been updated for the following changes:  

1) The Gentoo configure-fix-kdemultimedia-juk.patch is unnecessary; it has  
been patched upstream.  
2) It should no longer expect akode to be in the tarball; KDE moved akode out  
of kdemultimedia.  
3) It should instead use media-libs/akode which is the separate version of the  
library (and juk's configure script finds akode-config so it doesn't need a  
configure option).  

Attached is a patch which Works For Me With Akode that solves all three of the  
above issues.

------- Comment #1 From Brian S. Stephan 2005-09-23 10:48:18 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=69092) [edit]
Replacement juk-3.5_beta1 ebuild

A replacement ebuild. No akode extraction, no patch that was applied upstream,
fixed akode dep.

------- Comment #2 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-09-24 06:43:12 0000 ------- 
The ebuild should work properly now, thanks.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug