First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 104320
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: WONTFIX
Assigned To: Joshua Baergen (RETIRED) <joshuabaergen@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Joshua Baergen (RETIRED) <joshuabaergen@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 104320 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 104320 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2005-08-30 17:02 0000 
I just marked x86 stable today.  No bug reports during the 30 day period.

Referencing bug #100772, sparc will be at 30 days tomorrow but AMD64 needs
another 10 days strictly speaking.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:

------- Comment #1 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2005-08-30 18:49:26 0000 ------- 
sparc stable.

------- Comment #2 From Wormo 2005-09-02 22:45:59 0000 ------- 
ppc marked stable

------- Comment #3 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2005-09-04 07:44:10 0000 ------- 
looks like there is an issue:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1207257&group_id=67586&atid=523274

do you know an app to test it?

------- Comment #4 From Joshua Baergen (RETIRED) 2005-09-04 09:33:19 0000 ------- 
Ah, I saw that bug when I was first looking at the package but I had talked to
one  or two AMD64 users who never mentioned having an issue.  Since GLEW uses GL
the problem could have been caused by any number of things and so I disregarded
it at the time.

The Gentoo interest in this package has been development instead of use.  The
only thing I know of so far that uses GLEW is the to-be-added soya 0.10, which
is a library itself I believe.

If you're concerned about this we can try to contact upstream directly and see
what they say.

------- Comment #5 From Joshua Baergen (RETIRED) 2005-09-07 20:33:34 0000 ------- 
AMD64: bump

I can contact them, just don't want to do so if you already have.

------- Comment #6 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2005-10-04 14:27:13 0000 ------- 
we're currently testing a new alias system, sorry for the bugspam

------- Comment #7 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2005-10-21 03:49:14 0000 ------- 
sorry, forgot about this one. i didn't contact upstream as there was already a
bug. looking for a package that depends on glew i grepped the tree. the only one
i got is dev-python/soya, which doesn't have the amd64 keyword at all... in the
Changelog there is bug #100772 mentioned.. well, we usually follow the same
guideline as MIPS: don't keyword unless the users ask you to. so for now, i
removed the keyword completely.

------- Comment #8 From Goyo Roth 2005-10-23 17:47:37 0000 ------- 
Okay, I'm not adequately familiar with the gentoo development process to knoew
what all the bumping and wait periods or even the mention of the keyword. I do
know the amd64 keyword was removed, causing portage to yell at me when I updated. 

So maybe no other gentoo packages depend on this. Stuff I'm working on depends
on this. Some of us are developers too. 

If what you need to at least add this to ~amd64 is someone to request it, I so
request it. I never had any problems running with it before. Thanks.

------- Comment #9 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2005-10-24 08:41:38 0000 ------- 
Goyo, I readded ~amd64, thanks ;)
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug