First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 103112
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Java team <java@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Tiziano Müller <dev-zero@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 103112 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 103112 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-08-20 02:08 0000
I assume that there is a little typo in the RDEPEND line:     
jms? || ( =dev-java/openjms-0.7.6* =dev-java/openjms-bin-0.7.6* )"     
     
which should actually be:     
jms? ( =dev-java/openjms-0.7.6* =dev-java/openjms-bin-0.7.6* )"    
   
   
With the original version, the line   
use jms && antflags="${antflags} -Djms.jar=/opt/openjms/lib/jms-1.0.2a.jar"   
in src_compile() doesn't really make sense, does it?  
  

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:

------- Comment #1 From Markus Krainer 2005-08-20 02:46:22 0000 -------
I think the correct RDEPEND for 'jms' should actually be:

jms? ( || ( =dev-java/openjms-0.7.6* =dev-java/openjms-bin-0.7.6* ) )"

(Added betelgeuse@gentoo.org to CC as he's in cvs $Header:$; hope that's ok)

------- Comment #2 From Petteri Räty 2005-08-20 04:34:40 0000 -------
Well I get the java@gentoo.org email so it is useless to add me to CC. I should
have been more thorough when doing the version bump. Sorry about that. Actually
it is the use jms && antflags="${antflags}
-Djms.jar=/opt/openjms/lib/jms-1.0.2a.jar"    that should be fixed.

jms? ( =dev-java/openjms-0.7.6* =dev-java/openjms-bin-0.7.6* )"   
This means that both openjms and openjms-bin are needed, which is not the case.

------- Comment #3 From Petteri Räty 2005-08-20 05:01:17 0000 -------
I reverted to the old behaviour because depending on openjms would bring a
circular dependency.

------- Comment #4 From Tiziano Müller 2005-08-20 10:15:03 0000 -------
And depending on dev-java/openjms, which depends on dev-java/jms, where the 
user has to register at Sun is also not such a good idea, for just having the 
log4j emerged... 

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug