Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 101678 - digest check fails for app-admin/conky-1.2
Summary: digest check fails for app-admin/conky-1.2
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Daniel Black (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-07 14:59 UTC by Olivier Crete (RETIRED)
Modified: 2005-08-07 15:19 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Olivier Crete (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-07 14:59:42 UTC 
The digest check fails for for app-admin/conky-1.2 .. even the file size has
changed..
Comment 1 Andy Kissner 2005-08-07 15:03:46 UTC 
Could you be a bit more verbose?
Have you sync'd lately?
Try:
ebuild /usr/portage/app-admin/conky/conky-1.2.ebuild digest
Comment 2 Brenden Matthews 2005-08-07 15:07:34 UTC 
(In reply to comment #0)
> The digest check fails for for app-admin/conky-1.2 .. even the file size has
> changed..

Please fetch conky-1.2.tar.bz2 from
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=143975&package_id=158249&release_id=347435,
and place it in /usr/portage/distfiles
Comment 3 Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-07 15:13:18 UTC 
fixed. Thanks Olivier and Brenden 
 
Should be: 
more files/digest-conky-1.2 
MD5 ac197caa27914f4c47e24d5bdf8510e8 conky-1.2.tar.bz2 13217 
after resync
Comment 4 Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-07 15:14:02 UTC 
or MD5 ac197caa27914f4c47e24d5bdf8510e8 conky-1.2.tar.bz2 132171 
(i'll learn to copy right one day)
Comment 5 Brenden Matthews 2005-08-07 15:19:03 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> or MD5 ac197caa27914f4c47e24d5bdf8510e8 conky-1.2.tar.bz2 132171 
> (i'll learn to copy right one day) 

Ah, okay, I see what happened.  I figured maybe the wrong file got into the
distfile servers.  I double checked the md5sum in bug 101604 so I assumed the
digest was fine.