First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 101488
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Terry McIntyre <terrymcintyre@yahoo.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 101488 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 101488 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-08-05 14:34 0000
emerge thinkpad fails with following output:

>>> emerge (1 of 1) app-laptop/thinkpad-4.8 to /
<snippage>
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) thinkpad_4.8.tar.gz
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking thinkpad_4.8.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/thinkpad-4.8/work
mv: cannot stat `drivers': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat `include': No such file or directory
>>> Source unpacked.

<snippage>

thinkpad.c:50:27: linux/wrapper.h: No such file or directory


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge thinkpad
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
emerge fails


# emerge --info

Portage 2.0.51.19 (default-linux/x86/2005.0, gcc-3.3.5, glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1,
2.6.12-gentoo-r6 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.12-gentoo-r6 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.70GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.13
Python:              dev-lang/python-2.3.4-r1 [2.3.4 (#1, Mar 10 2005, 20:47:05)]
distcc 2.18.3 i386-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [disabled]
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.4-r1
sys-apps/sandbox:    [Not Present]
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.59-r6, 2.13
sys-devel/automake:  1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.5, 1.4_p6, 1.6.3, 1.9.4
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.10-r4
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.8.1-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-O2 -mcpu=i686"
CHOST="i386-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config
/usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -mcpu=i686"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://distfiles.gentoo.org
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X alsa apm arts avi berkdb bitmap-fonts crypt cups emboss encode esd
fam foomaticdb fortran gdbm gif gnome gpm gtk gtk2 imlib ipv6 jpeg kde libg++
libwww mad mikmod mmx motif mp3 mpeg ncurses nls oggvorbis opengl oss pam pdflib
perl png python qt quicktime readline sdl spell sse sse2 ssl tcpd tiff truetype
truetype-fonts type1-fonts xml2 xmms xv zlib userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CBUILD, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS, PORTDIR_OVERLAY

------- Comment #1 From Jeffrey Portman 2005-09-15 15:32:48 0000 -------
This exact same thing happens to me when i try to recompile.

------- Comment #2 From Anton Bolshakov 2005-12-08 16:55:48 0000 -------
is anyone who is going to fix this? :) 
app-laptop/thinkpad-4.8 
 
Portage 2.0.51.22-r3 (default-linux/x86/2005.1, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r2, 
2.6.14-gentoo-r4 i686) 
================================================================= 
System uname: 2.6.14-gentoo-r4 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.86GHz 
 

------- Comment #3 From Petteri Räty 2005-12-14 06:47:15 0000 -------
app-laptop/thinkpad-5.8 does not have this problem. Probably the best course of
action is to mark this version stable. steev: brix said you promised to take
care of this package. Any objections to marking the latest version stable?

------- Comment #4 From Steev Klimaszewski 2005-12-14 08:22:05 0000 -------
as for marking it stable, ill ask the x86 herd if they will look into it.

------- Comment #5 From Petteri Räty 2005-12-14 08:26:31 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> as for marking it stable, ill ask the x86 herd if they will look into it.

You're in luck. I am part of the x86 and have a thinkpad at hand atm, but I
don't yet now how to use the kernel module, but I can trust your word that the
latest version is good. But it is likely that this issue is also present on
amd64 so they should be CC:ed to at least check.

------- Comment #6 From Steev Klimaszewski 2005-12-24 03:12:12 0000 -------
My OK to mark stable on x86.  

------- Comment #7 From Steev Klimaszewski 2005-12-24 03:13:37 0000 -------
Could someone from AMD64 please check app-laptop/thinkpad on one of their
machines?  latest stable for x86 doesn't compile, so 5.8 is going stable -
please test and mark either ~ or stable

------- Comment #8 From Petteri Räty 2005-12-24 03:25:43 0000 -------
Marked stable on x86.

------- Comment #9 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2005-12-29 11:32:21 0000 -------
if somebody could enlighten me on how this package ever got an amd64 keyword
i'd be very graceful... there are no amd64 powered thinkpads, to my best
knowledge, and it seems that this package is exclusively for thinkpads, so...?

------- Comment #10 From Petteri Räty 2005-12-29 11:36:43 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> if somebody could enlighten me on how this package ever got an amd64 keyword
> i'd be very graceful... there are no amd64 powered thinkpads, to my best
> knowledge, and it seems that this package is exclusively for thinkpads, so...?
> 

Seems like it has always been there:
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/app-laptop/thinkpad/thinkpad-3.2.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup

------- Comment #11 From Henrik Brix Andersen 2005-12-29 11:44:10 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> if somebody could enlighten me on how this package ever got an amd64 keyword
> i'd be very graceful... there are no amd64 powered thinkpads, to my best
> knowledge, and it seems that this package is exclusively for thinkpads, so...?

I've wondered the same thing... feel free to mark it -amd64.

------- Comment #12 From Benjamin Schindler (RETIRED) 2006-01-11 07:36:32 0000 -------
I've removed the amd64 keyword alltogether

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug